王肃与《古文尚书》“伪书”公案再探讨

Further Discussion of Wang Su and the"Fake Book" Case of Shang Shu Written by Ancient Style Prose

《古文尚书》"伪书"说,至清代阎若璩集"辨伪"之大成著《尚书古文疏证》后,遂成学界之"定论",而王肃"伪作"说,很大程度上也一并成为"定论"。事实上,《古文尚书》"伪书"公案还有待进一步讨论,而王肃"伪造"《古文尚书》说更是值得商榷。从经学本身及学术史来看,"证伪"者所提供的证据并不充分,王肃之所以被牵涉进"《古文尚书》‘伪书’案",当是"层累"地造成的。

After Yan Ruo-qu’s book'Evidence of Shang Shu Written by Ancient Style Prose'in Qing Dynasty,the'fake book'version of Shang Shu Written by Ancient Style Prose,became a'conclusion'in academic circle,and the version of Wang Su counterfeiting book also became a'conclusion'to a large extent.In fact,along with the research progress,the'fake book'case remains further discussion,and Wang Su’s'forgery'also need further discussion.The evidence provided by the'witness'is not sufficient,and the reason why Wang Su was involved in the case of'fake book'is that it was caused by'intentional cognizance'from the point of view of academic history.