替代性纠纷解决机制在著作权侵权纠纷中的适用——以著作权集体管理组织为原告的案件为例

An Empirical Analysis on the Application of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Copyright Infringement Disputes——Taking the Case of Copyright Collective Management Organization as the Accuser as an Example

替代性纠纷解决机制是降低纠纷解决成本、提高纠纷解决效率的有效途径。对于"证据确凿、事实清晰、案情明确"的案件,有必要采取替代性纠纷解决机制,避免浪费司法资源,提升纠纷解决效率。以著作权集体管理组织作为原告的著作权侵权纠纷案件,具有诉讼成本高、诉讼标的小、案情较为简单的特点,符合替代性纠纷解决机制适用的条件。同时,上位法确立的制度框架也为替代性纠纷解决机制的引入奠定了立法空间。因此,针对此类纠纷,建立"诉前调解"或"调解前置"机制,可以有效降低权利人维权成本,解决司法资源被过度占用的现实问题。

It is an important approach to improve the efficiency of dispute resolution as well as the rational disposition of judicial resources by alternative dispute resolution(ADR). It is necessary to adopt ADR to avoid wasting judicial resources and improve the efficiency of dispute resolution in cases of 'conclusive evidence and clear facts'. The copyright collective management organization as the accuser in the copyright infringement dispute in terms of litigation cost, litigation object, dispute and complexity of case, has the characteristics of high litigation cost, less amount of litigation and simple facts of a case, which is suitable for use ADR. At the same time, the institutional framework has laid a legislative space for ADR. The research demonstrates that the establishment of 'pre-pleading mediation' or 'intercession prepositive' can reduce the cost of legal rights protection for obliges and solve the problem of excessive occupation of judicial resources.