期刊文献+

ⅠA2~ⅡA2期子宫颈癌术后复发风险预测评分表的建立 被引量:8

Establishment of the Risk Prediction Scale of Postoperative Recurrence of Cervical Cancer in ⅠA2-ⅡA2 Stage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析ⅠA2~ⅡA2期子宫颈癌患者术后复发的影响因素,建立一个综合、简易、有效的复发风险预测评分表以评估患者术后复发风险。方法:回顾性纳入郑州大学第一附属医院2013年1月至2016年1月行子宫颈癌根治术的ⅠA2~ⅡA2期患者1193例作为建模队列。2016年2~6月收治患者287例作为验证队列。采用多因素Logistic回归分析术后复发的影响因素,根据分析结果建立复发风险预测评分表。根据所建模型受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线最佳界值(cut-off值)及评分大小将评分表分为低危、中危、高危。在验证队列中应用所建评分表,评判其可重复性。结果:①多因素Logistic回归分析示:肿瘤直径≥4 cm(OR 3.061,95%CI 1.123~8.347),浸润深度≥1/2(OR 2.565,95%CI 1.233~5.333),淋巴结转移(OR 2.919,95%CI 1.610~5.294),除鳞癌、腺癌的其他组织学类型(OR 3.297,95%CI 1.023~10.634),是影响复发的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。②纳入以上4个独立危险因素入子宫颈癌复发风险预测评分表,该评分表有较高的预测价值(AUC=0.749,95%CI 0.687~0.811),拟合优度一致性较高(χ~2=0.386,P>0.05)。评分表分层情况为低危(0~16分)、中危(16~31分)、高危(31~43分),经χ~2检验三层之间复发率差异有统计学意义(χ~2=72.610,P<0.05)。③经验证评分表与建模队列ROC曲线的AUC相比,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.016,P>0.05),其拟合优度一致性较高(χ~2=3.038,P>0.05),具有一定可重复性。结论:该研究构建的简易评分表可较准确预测ⅠA2~ⅡA2期子宫颈癌患者术后的复发风险,但仍需多中心大样本研究进一步完善与验证。 Objective:To analyze postoperative risk factors ofⅠA2-ⅡA2 stage cervical cancer,and establish a comprehensive,simple and effective postoperative recurrence risk prediction scale.Methods:A retrospective study of 1193 patients withⅠA2-ⅡA2 stage who underwent radical cervical cancer resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2013 to January 2016 was performed as the model cohort.From February 2016 to June 2016,287 patients were admitted as the validation cohort.Multivariate Logistic regression wasused to analyze the factors influencing postoperative recurrence,and a recurrence risk prediction scale was established according to the analysis results.According to the optimal cut-off value and score size of the ROC curve of the model,the rating scale was divided into three layers:low risk,medium risk and high risk.The reproducibility of the proposed scale was evaluated in the validation queue.Results:①Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that tumor size≥4 cm(OR 3.061,95%CI 1.123-8.347),infiltration depth≥1/2(OR 2.565,95%CI 1.233-5.333),lymph node metastasis(OR 2.919,95%CI 1.610-5.294),and other tissue types(OR 3.297,95%CI 1.023-10.634)were independent risk factors for recurrence(P<0.05).②The above four independent risk factors were included in the risk prediction scale of cervical cancer recurrence.The scale had high predictive value(AUC=0.749,95%CI 0.687~0.811)and high consistency of goodness of fit(χ~2=0.386,P>0.05).The grading of the scale was low risk(0-16),medium risk(16-31)and high risk(31-43).There was significant difference in recurrence rate among the three layers byχ~2 test(χ~2=72.610,P<0.05).③There was no significant difference between the verified score table and the AUC of the ROC curve of the modeling queue(Z=-0.016,P>0.05).The consistency of goodness of fit was high(χ~2=3.038,P>0.05),and it had certain reproducibility.Conclusions:The simple rating scale constructed in this study can accurately predict the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with stageⅠA2-Ⅱ2 cervical cancer,but multi-center large sample study is still needed to further improve and verify this scale.
作者 李盼盼 侯文静 张梦真 LI Panpan;HOU Wenjing;ZHANG Mengzhen(Gynaecology and Obstetrics,The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Cervical Disease Prevention and Treatment Engineering Center of Henan,Henan Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第9期694-700,共7页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 子宫颈癌 临床分期 复发 风险评分 Cervical cancer Clinical stages Recurrence Risk score
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献32

  • 1程玺,蔡树模,李子庭,薛木泉,吴小华,臧荣余.淋巴结转移的Ⅰb1~Ⅱb期子宫颈癌患者手术后的综合治疗及预后分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(8):539-543. 被引量:22
  • 2金志红,廖革望,江宁.复发、转移的年轻妇女宫颈癌91例临床分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2006,21(5):502-503. 被引量:6
  • 3吴素慧,张静,李颖,尚海霞,马纪华.子宫颈癌Ⅰb和Ⅱa期患者预后相关因素的分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(2):131-132. 被引量:8
  • 4Rotman M, Sedlis A, Piedmonte MR, et al. A phase Ⅲ randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic ontology group study [ J]. lnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 65 ( 1 ) : 169 - 176.
  • 5radical surgery of cervical cancer: zagreb experience[ J ]. Coil Antro- pal, 2007, 31 (Suppl 2): 155- 158.
  • 6Liu MT, Hsu JC, Liu WS, et al. Prognostic tactors allotting thc oul- come of early cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and post-operative adjuvant therapy [J ]. Eur J Cancer Care ( Engl ) , 2008, 17(2) : 174 - 181.
  • 7Gray HJ. Primary management of early stagc cervical cancer (ⅠAI = ⅠB) and appropriate selection of adjuvant therapy[J]. J Natl Compr Cane Netw, 2008,6:47 - 52.
  • 8Shepherd JH. Cervical cancer[ J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynae- col,2012,26 ( 3 ) : 293 - 309.
  • 9Yeh SA,Wan Leung S, Wang CJ,et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in early stage carcinoma of the uterine cervix: treatment results and prog- nostic factors[ J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1999,72( 1 ) : 10 - 15.
  • 10Figat M, Zalewski K, Dafiska-Bidzifiska A, et al. Clinical and his- topathological factors in patients with cervical cancer allowing to iden- tify candidates for less radical surgery[ J]. Ginekol Pal ,2012,83 ( 1 ) : 16 -21.

共引文献169

同被引文献86

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部