期刊文献+

中国传统逻辑思想的特质——以逻辑认知范式为坐标的考察

An Investigation on the Characteristics of Chinese Traditional Logic Thought:from the Perspective of Logic Cognitive Paradigm
原文传递
导出
摘要 在20世纪认知、理解和评价中国传统逻辑思想的实践中,西方逻辑学理论成为坐标与方法。在以西方逻辑学理论作为理解中国传统逻辑思想的坐标和方法的实践中,中国学者对中国传统逻辑思想特点展开了较为系统和深入的比较研究。由此研究所获得的结论有:与西方逻辑学理论比较,中国传统逻辑思想不是以'求得真理和规律'为目的,而是以求得实际效用为目的,追求逻辑的实用性,从而表现为'务实致用'的特点;中国传统逻辑推理强调通过直接接触事物获得知识,习惯于以此事物描述另一事物,具有感知与经验性,从而表现为'直观比拟'的特点;中国传统逻辑思想以讲述日常生活中的思维活动为任务,不注重论证的形式结构,只注重日常语言中的实际论证过程和应用性,从而表现为'非形式化'特点;中国传统逻辑思维方式注重综合性、整体性,而轻视分析性、个体性,从而表现为'综合整体'的特点;中国古代逻辑思维以'道'(境界或理念)为标准,以'道'为最高追求目标,从而表现为'‘道’为至上'特点。这些特点的揭示,不仅有助于全面、深入、准确地认识中国传统逻辑思想的特质,而且有助于丰富和发展中国传统逻辑思想内容。 The 20 th century witnessed the Chinese practice of taking Western logic theory as a method in recognizing,understanding and evaluating Chinese traditional logic thought.In this practice,Chinese scholars carried out a systematic and in-depth comparative study on the characteristics of Chinese traditional logic thought,based on which they had the following conclusions.Firstly,compared with the Western logic theory,Chinese traditional logic thought is not to seek truth and law,but the practical utility,thus showing a characteristic of pragmatic utility;Secondly,Chinese traditional logic thought emphasizes acquiring knowledge by going straight to things,by analyzing one thing to another,showing a characteristic of intuitive analogy.Thirdly,Chinese traditional logic thought orients in narrating thinking activities in daily life,paying much attention to actual argumentation process and response in daily language rather than its forms.Fourthly,Chinese traditional logic thought pays more attention to comprehensiveness and integrity,but neglects analyticity and individuality,thus showing a characteristic of a comprehensive wholeness.Lastly,Chinese traditional logic thought takes Tao as the highest goal pursuit,embodied by'Tao is supreme'.These findings helps not only to understand the characteristics of Chinese traditional logic thought comprehensively,thoroughly and accurately,but also to enrich and develop the content of Chinese traditional logic thought.
作者 李承贵 Li Chenggui
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《社会科学战线》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第10期28-35,281,共9页 Social Science Front
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AZD021)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献33

  • 1刘宝楠.论语正义[A]..诸子集成:第1册[z].北京:中华书局,1954..
  • 2梁启超.《近世文明初祖二大家之学说》[A]..《饮冰室合集·文集之十三》[C].,.第11-12页.
  • 3严复.《西学门径功用》[A]..《严复集》第1册[C].中华书局,1986年版.第94-95页.
  • 4亚里士多德.形而上学[A].苗力田.亚里士多德全集:第7卷[c].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993..
  • 5梁启超.《墨子学案》[A]..《梁启超全集》第六册[C].北京出版社,1999年.第3288页.
  • 6王先谦.荀子集解[A]..诸子集成[Z].北京:中华书局,1954..
  • 7亚里士多德.工具论[A]..亚里士多德全集:第1卷[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990..
  • 8文德尔班 罗达仁译.哲学史教程:上册[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987..
  • 9爱因斯坦.西方科学的基础和中国古代的发明[A].爱因斯坦文集:第1卷[C].北京:商务印书馆,1976.
  • 10王国维.《毛公鼎考释序》.《观堂集林》卷六,中华书局1959年版.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部