我国民法典编纂背景下知识产权立法模式之选择——以再法典化立法趋势为视角

The Choice of Legislative Mode of Intellectual Property Law in the Background of the Chinese Civil Code:From the Perspective of Re-codification

《法国民法典》、《德国民法典》采民商分立体例,与我国为民商合一体例不同,故我国无须依循其制。再法典化是当今世界各国立法趋势,知识产权之私权性质为TRIPs所确认,民法典系私权根本大法,自无将知识产权排除其外之理。知识产权与物权同为财产权体系重要组成部分,如将知识产权编排除于民法典之外,将造成民法典之不完备。物权与知识产权相同,依靠许多公法性质之法律来辅助,不能因此认为知识产权不宜于民法典中独立成编。民法典中将知识产权独立成编,设置'通则',规定知识产权法一般性规定,同时设置专节对专利权、商标、著作权等知识产权加以规定,将程序性、公法性具体规范交由其他法规进行规定。我国民法典应吸收崭新之时代产物,将知识产权独立成编,完善整个财产法体系,建立充满强大新生命之中国民法典。

Combination of Civil and Commercial Law is China’s traditional legislative mode,which is different from the French Civil Code and German Civil Code.Re-codification is the trend of legislation in the world.Civil Code is the fundamental law of private right,thus intellectual property right should not be excluded from Civil Code for it has been confirmed as private right by TRIPs and an important part of the property right with real right.Intellectual property law needs relative public law provisions and procedure provisions law just like Real Right Law,but it doesn’t prevent intellectual property law from being an independent section of Civil Code.Include intellectual property law as a separation section of the civil code,setting the General Principal Section for the general stipulations and special section for patent right,trademark right and copyright,with public and procedural norms by other laws and regulations.To establish a civil code with powerful new life,our civil code should take intellectual property law as an independent part,absorbing new product of the times,perfecting the system of property law system.