摘要
《侵权责任法》第20条所规定的获利返还请求权与侵权损害赔偿请求权存在密切联系。获利返还请求权是为克服侵权损害赔偿不足而产生的,但获利返还请求权不能为侵权损害赔偿所替代,其有独立的理论基础与适用条件。获利返还请求权也不是受害人损害数额的计算方法,也不宜以是否可以赔偿损害作为返还获利的先决条件。获利返还请求权在性质上属于独立的请求权类型,当事人可以选择依据获利返还请求权或者侵权损害赔偿请求权提出请求,但二者不能同时适用。
The right to disgorgement in article 20 of Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China is closely connected with the right to tort compensation.The right to disgorgement is designed to overcome the inadequacy of tort compensation,but it could not be replaced by tort compensation because of its own theoretical basis and application conditions.The right to disgorgement is not method of calculation of victim’ s damages,and not the prerequisite to gain tort compensation.The right to disgorgement is an independent kind of right to claim.The litigant can choose to exercise the right to disgorgement or the right to tort compensation,but both rights could not be exercise simultaneously.
出处
《私法》
CSSCI
2017年第1期112-127,共16页
Private Law Review