公共建筑作品之上的智力成果添附——从“埃菲尔铁塔夜间拍摄侵权”谈起

Intellectual Achievements Are Attached on Public Building Works:Speaking from“Shooting Eiffel Tower at Night Leads to Infringement”

对'埃菲尔铁塔夜间拍摄侵权'的判断是检验传统添附规则能否适用于知识产权领域的一次测试。传统添附制度旨在解决因添附产生带来的添附物产权不明的问题,考虑的仅仅是添附人和被添附人之间的关系。公共建筑作品之上的智力成果添附特殊之处在于,其首要不在于处理添附人和被添附人之间的关系,而在于处理添附人、被添附人和社会公众的关系。从'埃菲尔铁塔夜间拍摄侵权'这则新闻入手,通过比较各国著作权法关于公共建筑作品的规定,分析公共建筑作品和添附新成果之间的关系,归纳出公共建筑之上附着智力成果时的权利归属规则,尤其指出对'埃菲尔铁塔夜间拍摄权'的判断不能单单从版权的角度,还要从知识产权添附的角度厘清'主版权'和'从版权'的地位,'埃菲尔铁塔夜间拍摄权'是否成立,取决于主要是针对'主版权'的复制还是针对'从版权'的复制。最后,依据各国版权法具体情境作出对埃菲尔铁塔夜间拍摄是否侵权的司法判断。

The judgment of'Shooting Eiffel Tower at Night Leads to Infringement'is to test whether the traditional rules of attachment can be applied in the field of intellectual property.The traditional attachment system is designed to solve the problem of unclear property rights of additives due to attachment,The unique consideration is the relationship between both sides,the intellectual achievement of public works is peculiar in that it mainly deals not with the relationship between both sides,but also the relationship between both sides and the public.Starting from the news that'Shooting Eiffel Tower at Night Leads to Infringement',by comparing the provisions of the copyright law of various countries on the works of public buildings,analyzing the relationship between the works of public buildings and adding new achievements,summing up the rules of intellectual property attribution on the public buildings attached to,in particular,it pointed out that judging'Shooting Eiffel Tower at Night Leads to Infringement'can not only clarify the status of'main copyright'and'affiliated copyright'from the perspective of copyright,it is also necessary to clarify the status of'main copyright'and'affiliated copyright'from the perspective of the attachment of intellectual property rights.Whether or not'shooting Eiffel Tower at night leads to infringement'is established depends on whether the copyrights are primarily for'main copyright'and'affiliated copyright'.Finally,it will make different judicial judgments according to the specific circumstances of the copyright law of different countries.