期刊文献+

我国生态纺织品标准与2016版Oeko-Tex Standard100差异分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the Differences Between Eco-textile Technology Standards in China and Oeko-Tex Standard100(2016 edition)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对比分析我国GB/T18885-2009生态纺织品技术要求标准与2016版Oeko-Tex Standard100标准,围绕测试项目的主要差异,重点详解消解样品中的重金属、全氟化合物、邻苯二甲酸酯类、有机锡化合物、多环芳烃、阻燃剂、表面活性剂等有害物质测试项目差异。梳理2016版Oeko-Tex Standard 100与GB/T18885-2009结果表明,我国的生态纺织品标准体系中有害物质检测项目与国际标准还存在较大差异,关于纺织品中有害物质的限量研究已明显落后于国外标准,差异增大,迫切需要加大生态纺织品中有害物质的检测技术研究力度,加快生态纺织品的制修订工作。 This article compared GB/T18885-2009 technical specifications of ecological textiles with the 2016 version of Oeko-Tex Standard100, and analyzed the differences between the standards, mainly on the digestion of heavy metals, perf luorinated compounds, phthalates, organic tin compounds, antibacterial f lame retardants, surfactant agent residues and other harmful substances testing items. The comparison results show that huge differences exist between the international standard and Oeko-Tex standard100(2016 edition) in testing items of harmful substances. Obviously, there is a long way to catch the foreign standards in researching on harmful substances limits in textiles. The increasing, differences suggest that efforts should be paid to the harmful substances detection technology research for the ecotextiles, and the formulation of eco-textiles and revision should be accelerated.
出处 《标准科学》 2016年第S1期121-126,共6页 Standard Science
关键词 生态纺织品 OEKO-TEX 有害物质 eco-textile Oeko-Tex harmful substances
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

  • 1GB/T18885-2009生态纺织品技术要求[S].
  • 2Oeko - tex Standard 100 General and special conditions for the authorization to use the Oeko - Tex Standard 100 mark ( Edition 01/2010) [S].
  • 3HJ/T307--2006.环境标志产品技术要求生态纺织品[S].
  • 4The United States Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act [ S ]. 2008.
  • 5ECHA( European Chemicals Agency) Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concem for authorization [ EB/OL ]. http ://echa. europa. eu/chem - data/authorisation - process/candidate - list - table - en. asp..
  • 6GB/T24169--2009.氟化工产品和消费品中全氟辛烷磺酰基化合物(PFOS)的测定高效液相色谱-串联质谱法[S].
  • 7Simpson C D, Mosi A A, Cullen W R, et al. Composition and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in surficial marine sediments from Kitimat Harbor , Canada [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 1996, 181 : 265 -278.
  • 8王芳,冯昭燕.我国生态纺织品标准与Oeko-Tex~标准对比[J].印染,2009,35(10):41-43. 被引量:12

共引文献19

同被引文献2

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部