期刊文献+

医师对乳腺癌存活患者是否需要开始激素替代治疗的看法

The thoughts of physicians regarding the need to start hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 To investigate how physicians felt about HRT use in breast cancer survivors a half year after the WHI trial. Methods: In December 2002, a questionnaire was conducted in Flanders (Belgium). The survey contained a presentation of a 35- year-old breast cancer survivor who presented with climacteric symptoms after treatment with tamoxifen. Results: With a response rate of 33.65% , a majority of the physicians did not prescribe classical oral HRT (5.40% ) in this patient. Physicians prefer to prescribe tibolone (30.68% ) or other alternative treatment (50.00% ). The main reason was the fear for increased recurrence of breast cancer. Furthermore the WHI oestrogen plus progestin trial and its attention in the media, a half year prior to the survey, influenced one-third of the physician’s prescribing attitude. Conclusions: Two-thirds of the physicians did not change prescribing attitude after the WHI oestrogen plus progestin trial. HRT is a well proven effective treatment in breast cancer survivors with severe climacteric complaints, but a majority of physicians is not convinced of its safety in breast cancer survivors. Therefore, a majority of physicians do not find the need to prescribe HRT in breast cancer survivors. To investigate how physicians felt about HRT use in breast cancer survivors a half year after the WHI trial. Methods: In December 2002, a questionnaire was conducted in Flanders (Belgium). The survey contained a presentation of a 35- year-old breast cancer survivor who presented with climacteric symptoms after treatment with tamoxifen. Results: With a response rate of 33.65% , a majority of the physicians did not prescribe classical oral HRT (5.40% ) in this patient. Physicians prefer to prescribe tibolone (30.68% ) or other alternative treatment (50.00% ). The main reason was the fear for increased recurrence of breast cancer. Furthermore the WHI oestrogen plus progestin trial and its attention in the media, a half year prior to the survey, influenced one-third of the physician's prescribing attitude. Conclusions: Two-thirds of the physicians did not change prescribing attitude after the WHI oestrogen plus progestin trial. HRT is a well proven effective treatment in breast cancer survivors with severe climacteric complaints, but a majority of physicians is not convinced of its safety in breast cancer survivors. Therefore, a majority of physicians do not find the need to prescribe HRT in breast cancer survivors.
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册)》 2006年第5期17-18,共2页 Core Journal in Obstetrics/Gynecology
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部