期刊文献+

美国先进技术计划评估实践的特点与启示 被引量:2

Characteristic and Implications of Evaluation Practice of Advanced Technology Programs in the U.S.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国家科技计划改革后,为重点研发计划等新型科技计划构建评估体系既是改革的紧迫需求,也是支撑计划管理和决策的必要手段。本文着重介绍和分析了美国先进技术计划的监测评估方法以及典型的监测评估实践,包括项目评估、监测系统、经济社会影响评估、反事实评估等,并在此基础上从评估导向、评估方法、评估能力建设等方面为构建我国新型科技计划的评估体系提出几点建议。 After the reform of national science and technology programs,it is urgent to construct an evaluation system for the programs,such as the Key Research and Development Program,and it is also a necessity to support the program management and decision making.The monitoring and evaluation methods and some typical practices of Advanced Technology Program in the U.S.are introduced and analyzed in this paper,including project evaluation,monitoring system,economic and social impact evaluation,as well as the counterfactual evaluation.To help construct the evaluation system of new science and technology programs in China,some suggestions are proposed from the perspectives of evaluation orientation,method and capacity building.
作者 陶蕊 翟启江 TAO Rui;ZHAI Qijiang(China National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《世界科技研究与发展》 CSCD 2018年第6期549-558,共10页 World Sci-Tech R&D
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71273124)资助
关键词 先进技术计划 监测 评估 科技计划 ATP monitoring evaluation science and technology program
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1姜念云.关于政府科技计划的外部性[J].中国科技论坛,2005(1):37-39. 被引量:9
  • 2-.美国先进技术计划[J].国外科技动态,2001,12(5):16-16.
  • 3程华.政府科技投入与企业R&D--实证研究与政策选择[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:8.
  • 4BRIAN RIEDL.The advanced technology program. [ EB/OL ] .http ://www.cato.org/testimony/ctsm060397.html.2009-11- 12.
  • 5STEPHEN MOORE.The advanced technology program and other corporate subsidies[ EB/OL ] . http://www.cato.org/testimony/ctsm060397.html.2009-11- 12.
  • 6BRIAN RIEDL. The advanced technology program: time to end this corporate welfare handout [ EB/OL ]. http://www.heritage.org/research/budget/bg1665.cfm. 2009-10-10.
  • 7SOLVEIG SINGLETON,STEPHEN SLIVINSKI. Encouragin g research.The advanced technology program [ EB/OL ] . http ://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub id=5089&full=1.2010-01- 03.
  • 8EDWARD L, HUDGINS. The advanced technology progra-m, Cato Institute before the Subcommittee on Technology Commit -tee on Science United States House of Representatives [ EB/OL] .http: //www.cato.org/testimony/ct-hu323.html.2009-10-13.
  • 9E1LEEN NORCROSS , KYLE MCKENZIE1.An analysis of the office of management and budget's program assessment rati-ng tool (PART) for fiscal year 2007, Government Accou -ntability Project at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University [ z ] .2007.
  • 10DIANA ESPINOSA. Program assessment rating tool guidance [ z ] .2006.

共引文献26

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部