巨额财产来源不明罪的证据学分析——兼与香港地区《防止贿赂条例》第10条的比较研究

Analysis on the Crime of Property from Unidentified Sources from Evidence Science:Research on Comparing It to the “Article Tenth”of Prevention of Bribery Ordinance in Hongkong Rrea

"财产与官职不相称"的推定是香港地区《防止贿赂条例》一项重要规定,在反腐中具有"杀手锏"的作用。我国刑法第七修正案大幅度提高了巨额财产来源不明罪的刑期,使得该罪名再度成为热点。笔者将两者加以比照,在分析巨额财产来源不明罪的定位及设立该罪的现实意义的基础上,通过证据学分析,指出当前学界和实务界对巨额财产来源不明罪的争议,既与认识上的不清有关,也与体制的缺失有关。

"Disproportionate property and officer’s position"presumption is an important stipulation in The Bribery Prevention Ordinance of Hong Kong region and can produce the effect of "killer app "in the anti-corruption campaign. In our country’s Criminal Law( the seventh amendment),much longer prison term on the crime of property from unidentified sources has been imposed,thus making this charge a hot topic for debate. On the basis of analysis on positioning the crime of huge unidentified property and the significance of enacting this crime as well as on the evidence science,the author of this paper made a comparison between the two laws and pointed out that the controversy over the crime of huge unidentified property among the academic circle and law practitioners’ circle is related to both biased cognition and system shortcomings.