期刊文献+

110例老年人功能性胃肠病患者的健康状况评价 被引量:6

Evaluation on Health Condition of 110 Cases of Senile Functional Gastroenteropathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨老年功能性胃肠病的健康状况。方法采用横断面调查,对收集的360例功能性胃肠病患者和老年健康志愿者应用中华健康状况量表进行评价分析。结果老年患者组与老年健康者组各方面的健康状况平均得分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),提示老年患者的健康状况低于老年健康者。在精力和情绪两个方面,老年患者组比中青年患者组健康状况平均得分低(P<0.05);在疼痛和小便两个方面,老年患者组比中青年患者组健康状况平均得分高(P<0.05);在饮食、大便、睡眠、体质四个方面及整体健康状况,老年患者组与中青年患者组健康状况平均得分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。各不同年龄段的老年患者组健康状况除了精力方面外均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论样本局限于广州市区,农村患者是否具有同样的结果,需要进一步扩大规模与增加样本量开展研究证实。为了能够全面描述老年功能性胃肠病的健康状况,需要进一步扩大规模与增加样本量开展研究。 Objective To explore the conditions of senile functional gastroenteropathy. Methods A cross- sectional study was conducted. Evaluation and analysis of China Health condition scoring were given on 360 cases of senile functional gastroenteropathy patients and healthy senile volunteers. Results There was statistically significant difference between the patients and healthy volunteers in terms of the average scores of health condition( P < 0. 05). In the aspects of energy and moods,the patients showed lower scores( P < 0. 05). In terms of pain and urination,the scores of the patients were higher( P < 0. 05); In terms of diet,defecation,sleep and constitution,there was no statistically significant difference between the gastroenteropathy patients and healthy volunteers( P > 0. 05). Conclusion The samples are only collected from downtown,and it needs further study to prove whether patients in rural place show the same results.
出处 《世界中西医结合杂志》 2015年第10期1384-1386,共3页 World Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81373786) 国家临床脾胃病重点专科建设单位(国中医药医政医管便函[2012])108号 国家中医药管理局脾胃消化病重点学科(国家中医药发[2009])30号 国家中医药管理局十二五重点专科(国中医药医政医管便函[2012]02号)
关键词 功能性胃肠病 健康状况 中华健康状况量表 Functional gastroenteropathy Health condition China Health condition scoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1World Health Organization. The Development of the WHO quality of life assessment instrument. WHO, Geneva 1993
  • 2Important Issues in Patient Reported Outcomes(PRO) Research. Feb 16, 2001.http: //www. mapi-research-inst. com/index02. htm
  • 3Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life -a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 1995; 273:59 - 65
  • 4Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health atatus and quality of life instruments: attributes and review. Quality Life Res 2002; 11:193-205
  • 5Byrne B. Structural Equation Modeling with Lisrel, Prelis, and Simplis. Mahwah,New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1998:334
  • 6Kelloway EK. Using Lisrel for Structural Equation Modeling- A Researcher' s Guide. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications 1998
  • 7陈可冀 宋军.关于康复期生存质量的研究[A].杨维益.中医康复新治疗荟萃[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.69-73.
  • 8邱鸿钟.医学与人类文化[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1993.177.
  • 9Hunt SM, Mckznna SP, Mcewen J, et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations[J]. Soc Sci Med, 1981, 15:221 -229.
  • 10Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard We, et al. The Sickness impact Profile: validation of a heahh status measure [J]. Med Care, 1976, 14:57-67.

共引文献805

同被引文献63

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部