期刊文献+

欧盟消费者在线争议解决机制的新发展——2013年《欧盟消费者在线争议解决条例》述评 被引量:18

The New Developments of Consumer ODR Mechanism in EU:A Brief Review on the EU Regulation on Consumer ODR of 2013
原文传递
导出
摘要 由于电子商务的发展和传统争议解决机制的缺陷,为发挥ODR机制有效、便捷地解决消费者争议的优势,欧盟于2013年5月21日通过了《欧盟消费者ODR条例》。该条例旨在通过设立ODR平台,借助于ADR机构来法庭外解决商家和消费者之间因跨境在线销售合同和在线服务合同引发的争议以及成员国国内的在线交易争议,不仅丰富和发展了欧盟的消费者争议解决机制,而且在ODR平台的设立、ODR机制裁决结果的执行、消除ODR服务中的语言障碍以及官方推动ODR机制的发展等方面对完善我国电子商务ODR机制具有借鉴意义。 In the light of the development of e-commerce and the defects of traditional dispute resolution mechanisms,the European Parliament and the Council,aiming at playing ODR's effective and convenient advantages in resolution of consumer disputes,adopted on 21 May 2013,the EU Regulation on consumer ODR which consists of 3 chapters and 22 articles.This Regualtion applies to out-of-court resolution of disputes of domestic online transactions as well as the disputes concerning contractual obligations stemming from online sales or service contracts between a consumer resident in the Union and a trader established in the Union through the intervention of ADR entity,which not only enriches and develops the consumer dispute resolution mechanisms in EU,but also provides a reference for the improvement of ODR in China's e-commerce in many aspects such as the establishment of ODR platform,the implementation of results arising out of ODR,the elimination of language barriers in ODR services as well as the official promotion of the development of ODR.
出处 《国际法研究》 2015年第3期56-67,共12页 Chinese Review of International Law
关键词 《消费者ODR条例》 电子商务 ODR平台 ADR EU Regulation on Consumer ODR E-commerce ODR Platform ADR
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1杜志华.欧盟消费者保护政策的形成与发展[J].欧洲,2001,19(5):83-90. 被引量:7
  • 2Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary of the English Dictionary, Unabridged Second Edition, Cleveland and New York: The Work Publishing Company 1974, p. 963.
  • 3Auberg L.Diamond. Harmonisation of Private International Law[J]. Recuil Des Cours Ⅳ 1986, p 299.
  • 4Directive 97/55/EC of European Parliament and of the council of 6 October 1997 amending Directive 84/450/EEC concerning misleading advertising so as to include comparative advertising, OJ L 194, 10 July 1998, p. 54 ).
  • 5In order to define the deadline for performance, the time of conclusion of the contract should be appointed Non-repudiation mechanisms can be used to generate the required time and date evidence.
  • 6Directive 99/44/EC of European Parliament and of,the council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, OJ L 171, 7 July 1999, p. 78.
  • 7Directive 97/7/EC of European Parliament and of the council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumer in respect of distance contracts, OJ L 144, 4 June 1997, pp. 19-27.
  • 8Commission Recommendation 97/489/EC of 30 July 1997 concerning transactions by electronic payment instruments and in particular the relationship between issuer and holder, OJ L 208, 2 August 1997, pp. 52-58.
  • 9Commission Recommendation 98/257/EC of 30 March 1998 on the bodies responsible for the out-of-court settlement of consumer disputes, OJ L 115, 17 April 1998, pp. 31-34.
  • 10C.E J. Scholten. E . W.P. Koot & J.J.Borking, Millennium& Mediation, Computerrecht 1999, p. 5.

同被引文献172

引证文献18

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部