邓之诚《清诗纪事初编》对《四库提要》的接受与批评论略

Study on the Acceptance and Criticism of Qing Shi Ji Shi Chu Bian to Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu Ti Yao

邓之诚《清诗纪事初编》作者小传的写法与《四库提要》极为相近,通阅《初编》可知,邓氏其实是将《四库提要》作为一个参照体和批评体。《初编》和《四库提要》有着共同传主逾一百七十人,通过比较这相同的传主发现,《初编》对《四库提要》的接受,主要表现为诗人小传在形式上对《四库提要》的模仿,简短扼要而又不失要领,将其置于提要之中,几可乱真。然而邓氏受《四库提要》影响之深不只是《四库提要》的写作方法,更重要的是他能够对诗人事迹进行考证,对诗集版本进行探索,对诗歌特点进行评判。邓氏的史学视野具有文学之气质,而文学品评之中也契合相关史实研究,二者的结合粗略形成清初文人诗文评价这一学术体系。

The biography of author between Deng Zhicheng’s Qing Shi Ji Shi Chu Bian and Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu Ti Yao is very close. In fact, Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu Ti Yao is the model of reference and criticism on Deng Zhicheng’s Chu Bian. There are more than one hundred and seventy people’s biography in common in the two works. Through the comparison of the same biography, the acception of Chu Bian towards Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu Ti Yao mainly revealed in the form of the poet biography. Chu Bian’s imitation is brief and significant. However, the Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu Ti Yao by Deng’s deep influence is not only on the writing method of Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu Ti Yao, but also on the textual research of poets deeds, the poetry version, and the characteristics of poetry. Deng’s historical vision has the makings of literature, and literary criticism is also related to the study of relevant historical facts. The combination of the two forms roughly forms the academic system of poetry and prose evaluation in the early Qing dynasty.