《书》类“总目提要”与文渊阁本书前提要比勘

The Differences between Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu and the Summaries Which Included in the Wenyuan Pavilion’s Si Ku Quan Shu——Based on the Analysis of the Book of History Researching

比勘《书》类《四库全书总目》与书前提要异同,二者在作者简介、内容介绍、学术评价、版本选取等方面有不同,在价值取向上则呈现为朱子学成为学术评价标准,围绕蔡沈《书集传》的研究和《尚书》辨伪成为《尚书》学重要领域,《尚书》著述的收录和评述揭示了四库馆臣兼包并蓄的学术视野。

A summary of a work in Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu some time is different from the summary of the same work which included in Wenyuan Pavilion’s Si Ku Quan Shu.These differences include the biography of authors,brief introduction of the content,academic evaluation and version selection about a work.These summaries even have same of value.The viewpoints of Zhu Xi became evaluation criteria of the works which reaching The Book of History.There were two key areas about The Book of History after the Song Dynasty.One was the reaching about Cai Chen’Shu ji zhuan,the other was doubting about The Book of History.These works which included in The Wenyuan Pavilion’s Si Ku Quan Shu and the viewpoints of the editors presented broad academic perspectives.