摘要
《侵权责任法》第36条第2款确定的规则被称为"提示规则",它借鉴了美国"通知与取下"程序,但是一定程度上偏离了"避风港规则"的目的,存在一定的不足,使得该条款在中国适用时难以发挥其应有的价值。要发挥"提示规则"的作用,最重要的是要明晰该规则中的"通知",探究各类权利通知的法律效果。
Rule 36,paragraph 2 of the Tort Liability Act is called'prompt rule',which draws on the U. S. 'notice and take off'program,but deviated from the purpose of the'safe harbor rules'to a certain extent. There is a certain deficiencies,so that it is difficult to play its proper value when applying in China. It is important to clarify the'notice',explore the legal effect,which is conducive to further improve the standard of'prompt rule. '
出处
《华北水利水电大学学报（社会科学版）》
2014年第3期96-98,共3页
Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power(Social Science Edition)
关键词
网络侵权
提示规则
网络服务提供者
network tort
rule of prompted
the network service provider
