期刊文献+

对称涨跌幅限制的非对称性效果研究—来自中国上证A股市场的证据 被引量:2

Symmetric Price Limits and Their Asymmetric Effects:Evidence from Shanghai A-Share Stock Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文利用中国上证A股的相关数据,通过扩展的GARCH模型验证涨幅限制与跌幅限制对收益序列性和收益波动性的影响及其差异,并在控制了反映公司和股票特征的相关变量之后,进一步分析了涨跌幅限制影响的行业差异。研究发现:涨跌幅限制对股票收益序列相关性的影响倾向于不显著,但对股票收益波动性的影响倾向于显著;涨幅限制影响的行业差异显著存在,而跌幅限制影响的行业差异不显著。在分析造成波动性的非对称性影响效果的原因时,本文发现市场β值、市值越大的公司,涨跌幅限制越容易对其产生非对称的影响。上述结果验证了在不同行业设置不同价格涨跌限制和设置非对称涨幅限制和跌幅限制的合理性。 By estimating the extended GARCH model using the CSMAR database,we test the asymmetric effects of price |imits on the return sequentiality and return volatility in upward and downward price movements.We further study different effects among different industries after controlling other factors that reflect firm and stock features.We find that the effects of price limits on the return sequentiality tend to be insignificant while the effects of price limits on the return volatility tend to be significant.The effect of upper limits among the industries is significant while that of lower limits is insignificant.We empirically test the factors for the asymmetric effects of price limits on the volatility and find that for the firms with higher Beta and larger size,the effect of price limits is more likely to be asymmetric.These results suggest that it is reasonable to set different price limits for different industries and asymmetric upper and lower limits.
出处 《数理统计与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期942-950,共9页 Journal of Applied Statistics and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(11001224) 西南财经大学科研基金资助项目(2010XG087)
关键词 扩展的GARCH模型 涨跌幅限制 收益序列性 收益波动性 非对称性 extended GARCH model price limits return sequentiality return volatility asymmetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献34

  • 1赵振全 吕继宏.《涨跌停板对市场有效性的影响》[A]..《21世纪数量经济学》[C].中国统计出版社,2001..
  • 2[1]Heston S L, Rouwenhorst K G. Industry and country effects in international stock returns[J].Journal of Portfolio Management, 1995,22:53-58
  • 3[2]Stan B, Connor G, Curds R. National versus global influences on equity returns[J].Financial Analysts Journal, 1996,52(2):31-39
  • 4[3]Griffin J M, Karolyri G A. Another look at the role the industrial structure of markets for international diversified strategies[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 1998,50(3):351-373
  • 5[4]Baca S P, Garbe B L, Weiss R A. The rise of sector effects in major equity markets[J].Financial Analysts Journal, 2000, 52(4):34-40
  • 6[1]LEE, SANG-BIN and CHUNG, JEE, SEOK. Price limits and stock market efficiency[J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23(4), 1996.
  • 7[2]KODRES, LAURA, E., Tests of unbiasedness in the foreign exchange futures markets: An examination of price limits and conditional heteroscedasticity[J].Journal of Business, 66,1993.
  • 8[3]LEE, SANG-BIN and KIM, KEANG-JUNG. The effect of price limits on stock price volatility: Empirical evidence in Korea[J].Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 22(2), 1995.
  • 9[4]PHYLAKTIS, KATE and KAVUSSANOS, MANOLIS and MAMALIS, KIKAS. Price limits and stock market volatility in the Athens stock exchange[J]. European Financial Management, 5(1),1999.
  • 10Kenneth A. Kim and S. Ghon Rhee, 1997. price limit performance: evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Journal of finance Vol.LII, NO. 2 June 1997.

共引文献62

同被引文献57

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部