期刊文献+

Leep刀治疗宫颈糜烂的临床疗效 被引量:1

Clinical Effect of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure(LEEP) in the Treatment of Cervical Erosion(CE)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察Leep刀治疗宫颈糜烂的临床效果。方法:采用Leep刀对340例宫颈糜烂进行治疗,根据病变范围选用不同电极,切除范围超过病变边缘0.5cm,并尽量保证环切标本的连续性和完整性,根据病变深浅程度确定切割深度,观察手术效果和并发症。结果:340例患者中,除2例宫颈癌外,3个月后复查1次性治愈335例,治愈率为98%;3例Ⅲ~0宫颈糜烂治愈后3个月复查好转Ⅰ~0,有效率为1%。结论:Leep刀治疗宫颈糜烂操作简单,安全有效,不需麻醉,具有手术时间短、出血少、治愈率高、不损伤宫颈功能且可提供完整的病理标本的优点,故具有诊断和治疗的双重作用,是宫颈疾病最理想的治疗方法。 Objective: To observe the clinical effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP) in the treatment of cervical erosion(CE). Methods: Different electrodes were selected according to the lesion scope, and the resection scope exceeded 0.5 cm of the lesion edge, and the continuity and integrity of the circumscribed specimen were ensured as far as possible. The cutting depth was determined according to the depth of lesion. Results and complications were observed. Results: Among the 340 cases, except for 2 cases of cervical cancer, 335 cases were reexamined once after 3 months, and the cure rate was 98%. 3 patients with Ⅲ degree CE were improved and turned to be Ⅰ degree after 3 month,effective rate was 1%. Conclusion: LEEP treatment is simple, safe and effective in the treatment of cervical erosion without anesthesia. It has the advantages of short operation time, less bleeding, high cure rate, no damage to the cervical function and can provide complete pathological specimens. Therefore, it has the dual functions of diagnosis and treatment, and is the most ideal treatment method for cervical diseases.
作者 胡世佳 Hu Shijia(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Wuhan Com mercial and Vocational Hospital,Wuhan 430030)
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2019年第4期513-514,共2页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 LEEP刀 宫颈糜烂 临床效果 loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP) cervical erosion clinical effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1Fung KFM, Senterman M, Faught W. Should endocervieal excision and curettage be done during LEEP? Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 1997,18(2) :104.
  • 2Hillemanns P, Kimmig R, Danneeker C, et al. LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias.Zentralbl Gynakol,2000,122( 1 ) :35.
  • 3Boulanger JC, Gondry J, Verhoest P, et al. Treatment of CIN after menopause. Bur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2001,95 (2) : 175.
  • 4John Y,John A,Julius,et al. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in postcone hysterectomy specimens. Obstet Gyneco1,1994,84( 1 ) :128.
  • 5Lapaquette TK, Dinh TV, Hannigan E, et al. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol,1993,82(3) :440.
  • 6Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcon T, et al. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome : North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,172 (4) : 1246.
  • 7Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,102 (6) :467.
  • 8连利娟.林巧稚妇科肿瘤学[M]:第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.139.
  • 9吴东耀,廖嘉丽,潘定中,颜婉嫦,黄令翠.应用子宫颈电圈切除术诊治子宫颈上皮内瘤样变的近期观察[J].中华妇产科杂志,1997,32(7):402-404. 被引量:55
  • 10钱德英,曾仁海,洪淡华.电环切除术标本的热损伤及组织学研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,1999,15(5):289-290. 被引量:89

共引文献705

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部