期刊文献+

舒芬太尼联合七氟烷在胸微创先心封堵术的麻醉效果分析 被引量:1

Anesthetic Effect of Sufentanil Combined with Sevoflurane in Minimally Invasive Congenital Heart Closure in the Chest
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究舒芬太尼联合七氟烷在胸微创先心封堵术的麻醉效果。方法:选取2016年3月~2017年9月某院收治的98例行胸微创先心封堵术的患儿为研究对象,根据麻醉方法分为观察组(57例)和对照组(41例)。观察组给予舒芬太尼联合七氟烷维持麻醉,对照组给予丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼维持麻醉,比较两组患者的麻醉效果。结果:两组患者术中HR、SBP及DBP水平与手术前相比均提高,但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组苏醒时间、拔管时间、躁动评分及复苏室停留时间均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:舒芬太尼联合七氟烷在胸微创先心封堵术的效果显著,且患者苏醒迅速,值得临床推广。 Objective:To investigate the anesthetic effect of sufentanil combined with sevoflurane in minimally invasive congenital heart closure in the chest. Methods: A total of 98 children underwent minimally invasive chest closure in a hospital from March 2016 to September 2017 were selected as the study subjects. According to the method of anesthesia, they were divided into observation group(57 cases) and control group(41 cases). The observation group was given sufentanil and sevoflurane to maintain anesthesia, and the control group was given propofol and remifentanil to maintain anesthesia. The anesthetic effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The levels of HR, SBP and DBP in the two groups were increased compared with those before surgery, but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). The awakening time, extubation time, restlessness score, and resuscitation room residence time in observation group were all lower than those in the control group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: The effect of sufentanil combined with sevoflurane in the minimally invasive congenital thoracic closure of the chest is significant, and the patient recovers rapidly and is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 苏孟勤 钟巍 Su Mengqin(Department of Anesthesiology,Henan Provincial Hospital,Zhengzhou 450008)
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2019年第4期578-579,共2页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 舒芬太尼 七氟烷 胸微创先心封堵术 麻醉 sufentanil sevoflurane minimally invasive chest closure anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献25

  • 1张晓琴,蔡英敏,薛荣亮,赵莉.舒芬太尼在老年患者全麻诱导中对血液动力学的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(8):525-526. 被引量:88
  • 2郭胜勇,朱金忙.静脉注射地塞米松预防手术及术后镇痛引起的恶心呕吐[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(2):163-164. 被引量:33
  • 3庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮﹒现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:475-481.
  • 4Bailey PL,Streisand JB,East KA,et al. Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid-induced respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil[ J]. Anesth Analg, 1990,70( 1 ) :8 - 15.
  • 5Minkowitz HS. Postoperative pain management in patients undergoing major surgery after remifentanil vs. fentanyl anesthesia. Multicentre Investigator Group[ J]. Can J Anaesth,2000,47 (6) : 522 - 528.
  • 6Sarti A, Busoni P, Dell'Oste C, et al. Incidence of vomiting in susceptible children under regional analgesia with two different anaesthetic techniques [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2004,14 ( 3 ) : 251 - 255.
  • 7岳云,吴新民,罗爱伦,主译.疼痛治疗[M].//摩根临床麻醉学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:311-313.
  • 8Bali A,Sharma JI,Gupta SD.Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia[J].JK Science,2007,9(4):161-163.
  • 9Rawal N,Schollin J,Wesstrom G.Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for cesarean section[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1988,32(1):61-66.
  • 10孙杰,王忠云,丁正年.七氟醚麻醉诱导在患儿全身麻醉中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2008,24(6):468-470. 被引量:52

共引文献53

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部