期刊文献+

宋代“不武”不能独罪武举、武学制度 被引量:1

“Military Incompetence” of the Song Dynasty Should Not Be Ascribed to the System of Imperial Military Examination and Martial Art
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宋代武举、武学招致很多批评,被认为是宋之"不武"的原因。本文考察武举、武学生的军事实践,认为其具有一定的军事能力,并在对外御侮、维持社会稳定以及军事外交方面都有不可忽视的贡献。从整个宋代来看,武举、武学军功少而不彰的原因是录取人数少、从军人少、有军功而不得重用。武举、武学不是宋之"不武"的原因,而只是其表现之一。 The imperial military examination and martial art of the Song Dynasty incurred much criticism and was regarded as the cause of military incompetence of the Song Dynasty. This article reviews the military practice of the imperial military examination and marital art students. It is of the opinion that the imperial military examination and martial art students had some military power and rendered assignable contributions to fighting against external invasion, maintaining social stability and military diplomacy. Throughout the Song Dynasty, the reason of the lack of military achievements of imperial military examination and marital lies in the shortage of enrolled students of imperial military examination, the lack of people joining the army and those who had military achievements were not put in important positions. So imperial military examination and marital art were not the reason of the military incompetence of the Song Dynasty. They were only on aspect of the incompetence.
作者 周兴涛
出处 《孙子研究》 2015年第4期99-108,共10页 Sunzi Studies
基金 国家社科基金西部项目"宋代武举文化研究"(编号:12XZS011)之阶段性成果
关键词 宋代 “不武” 武学 Song Dynasty 'Military Incompetence' Martial Art
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献98

  • 1祝尚书.宋人别集叙录[M].北京:中华书局,1999..
  • 2[3][宋]李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局点校本,1979.
  • 3宋会要辑稿·选举一八之一七[M].
  • 4宋会要辑稿·选举一八之一八一一九[M].
  • 5宋会要辑稿·选举六之四О[M].
  • 6(元)马端临.文献通考·卷一五四[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 7旧唐书·卷一九下[M].
  • 8(宋)苏轼.东坡全集·卷五五·举何去非换文资状[M].崇祯刻本.
  • 9(宋)孟元老.东京梦华录·序[M].《笔记小说大观》本.
  • 10(宋)佚名.庆元条法事类·卷一五[M].续修四库全书本.

共引文献105

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部