摘要
本文通过对《左传》《世本》《史记》三部古籍与《新唐书宰相世系表》和《古今姓氏书辩证》所记陈(田)完家世及其传承的进一步对比和分析,认为后两种古籍所记明显有误,再次得出"孙书非陈书,也非孙武之祖"的观点,并认为这是破解众多孙武世次之谜的一把钥匙。
Through the further comparison and analysis of Chen(Tian) Wan's lineage and succession recorded in the three ancient classical books—Tso Chuan, Shi Ben and Shih Chi as well as Pedigree Chart of the Prime Ministers of Xintangshu and Differentiation and Analysis of Ancient and Modern Family Names, the author of this article is of the opinion that the records on the latter two classical books have remarkable errors, thus the opinion that 'Sun Shu is neither Chen Shu nor Sun Wu's ancestor' is concluded, which can be regarded as a key to crack many puzzlements about Sun Wu's lineage.
出处
《孙子研究》
2017年第1期85-92,共8页
Sunzi Studies
关键词
陈(田)完
孙书
孙武
世系传承
Chen(Tian) Wan
Sun Shu
Su Wu
Lineage Succession