期刊文献+

中文版10项目大五人格量表在乳腺癌病人中应用的信效度分析 被引量:4

Reliability and validity analysis of application of Ten-Item Personality Inventory-Chinese version for breast cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]检验中文版10项目大五人格量表(TIPI-C)在乳腺癌群体中的信效度。[方法]采用TIPI-C和中文大五人格问卷简式版(CBF-PI-B)对115例乳腺癌病人进行调查。[结果]TIPI-C外向性、宜人性、尽责性、情绪稳定型和开放性分量表的Cronbach′sα系数分别为0.708,0.443,0.687,0.673,0.666,重测信度为0.819~0.901。验证性因素分析各拟合指标:χ~2/df(1.86),符合模型拟合较好的标准,比较拟合指数(CFI,0.892)、塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI,0.814)、近似均方根误差(RMSEA,0.087)达到可接受水平。校标关联效度除宜人性维度外,其余均有统计学意义。[结论]TIPI-C为极其简短的人格测量工具,内在信度不太乐观,但有良好的重测信度、效度以及在使用过程中的优势,仍有临床应用价值。 Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory-Chinese version(TIPI-C) in the breast cancer population.Methods:A total of 115 breast cancer patients were investigated with TIPI-C and Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version(CBF-PI-B).Results:The Cronbach α coefficients of the five subscales of TIPI-C were 0.708(Extraversion),0.443(Agreeableness),0.687(Conscientiousness),0.673(Emotional Stability),0.666(Openness to experience),and the test-retest reliability was 0.819 ~0.901.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that each fitting index χ~2/df(1.86) was in line with the better model fit;comparative fit index TFI(0.892) and Tucker-Lewis index TLI(0.814) were the approximate roots mean square error(0.087),which reached the acceptable level.In addition to the dimension of amenity,the calibration validity of the calibration was statistically significant.Conclusions:Although TIPI-C was not very optimistic at internal reliability as an extremely brief personality measurement tool,considering its good test-retest reliability,validity,and advantages in use,it still has clinical application value.
作者 李璐璐 张蒙悦 赵雯倩 王雯 李小妹 LI Lulu;ZHANG Mengyue;ZHAO Wenqian;WANG Wen;LI Xiaomei(Department of Nursing of Xi′an Jiaotong University,Shaanxi 710000,China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2019年第6期970-973,共4页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 中文版10项目大五人格量表 乳腺癌 信度 效度 Ten-Item Personality Inventory-Chinese version breast cancer reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献71

  • 1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 2Ling Yang.Incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in China[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(1):17-20. 被引量:345
  • 3陈明立,谭远发.我国东中西部三大区域人口竞争力实证比较研究[J].经济学家,2007(2):53-63. 被引量:6
  • 4杨智辉,王建平.癌症患者人格类型及其与应对策略、社会支持的关系[J].心理学探新,2007,27(2):88-90. 被引量:20
  • 5[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 6[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 7[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 8[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 9[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 10[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353

共引文献2643

同被引文献48

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部