期刊文献+

基于LS+AR模型的三种方式预报地球自转参数的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of three modes of LS+AR model for predicting Earth rotation parameters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究最小二乘(least squares,LS)模型和自回归(autoregression,AR)模型的组合(LS+AR)方法用于地球自转参数(Earth rotation parameters,ERP)的预报时,不同的预报方式对预报结果的影响,我们采用递推、迭代和间隔这3种预报方式对ERP进行预报。结果表明,这3种方式对日长变化(length of day,LOD)所有跨度预报的精度相当,而递推方式在极移所有跨度的预报上表现出精度优势,间隔方式次之,迭代方式最差。在数据利用率和计算速度方面,递推和迭代方式的数据利用率高,但前者的计算量明显小于后者,而间隔方式的数据利用率低,但计算速度最快。 In order to study the influences of the different modes of combined LS(least square)+AR(autoregression) model on the prediction of ERP(Earth rotation parameters), we adapted three modes, i.e. the recursion mode, the iteration mode and the interval mode, to predict ERP. The results show that the three modes have equivalent prediction accuracies in forecasting the length of day(LOD) for all prediction spans, while in forecasting the polar motion the recursion mode has the highest prediction accuracy, and the interval mode outperforms the iterative mode. In addition, the analyses indicate that the data-utilization rates for the recursion and iterative modes are higher than that for the interval mode, however, the interval mode shows the fastest computation speed compared with the other two modes, and the amount of calculation for recursion mode is less than that for iteration mode.
出处 《时间频率学报》 CSCD 2015年第1期52-60,共9页 Journal of Time and Frequency
基金 中国科学院"西部之光"人才培养计划"联合学者"资助项目
关键词 地球自转参数 预报 LS+AR模型 递推方式 迭代方式 间隔方式 Earth rotation parameters(ERP) prediction LS+AR model recursion mode iteration mode interval mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献47

共引文献81

同被引文献8

  • 1王琪洁,廖德春,周永宏.地球自转速率变化的实时快速预报[J].科学通报,2007,52(15):1728-1731. 被引量:15
  • 2TOMASZ N, KOSEK W. Prediction of UT1 - UTC, LOD and AAM X3 by combination of least-squares and multivariate stochastic methods[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2008, 82(2): 83-92.
  • 3SCHUH H, ULRICH M, EGGER D, et al. Prediction of Earth orientation parameters by artificial neural networks[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2002, 76(5): 247-258.
  • 4AKYILMAZ O, KUTTERER H. Prediction of Earth rotation parameters by fuzzy inference systems[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2004, 78(1): 82-93.
  • 5GROSS R S, EUBANKS T M, STEPPE J A, et al. A Kalman filter-based approach to combining independent Earth-orientation series[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 1998, 72(4): 215-235.
  • 6KALARUS M, SCHUH H, KOSEK W, et al. Achievements of the Earth orientation parameters prediction comparison campaign[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2010, 84(10): 587-596.
  • 7GERARD P, BRAIN L. IERS Conventions(2010)[S]. Germany: verlag des Bundesamts fur Kartographie und Geodasie, 2011: 123-131.
  • 8BIZOUARD C, GAMBIS D. The combined solution C04 for Earth orientation parameters consistent with international terrestrial reference frame 2005[J]. The series International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 2009, 134: 265-270.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部