期刊文献+

血清CEA、CYFAR21-1、SCC、CA125水平对晚期非小细胞肺癌放疗疗效的评估价值 被引量:15

Assessment Value of Serum CEA,CYFAR21-1,SCC,CA125 Levels in Efficacy of Radiotherapy for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清肿瘤标志物水平对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者放疗疗效的评估价值。方法将晚期非小细胞肺癌患者共176例,分为观察组(近期放疗有效)和对照组(近期放疗无效),采用电化学发光法检测放疗前、后血清肿瘤CEA、CYFAR21-1、SCC、CA125水平。结果 176例患者放疗有效率为58.0%,观察组放疗前血清CEA、CYFAR21-1、SCC、CA125水平分别为(33.65±5.41)ng/ml、(19.44±3.14)ng/ml、(16.87±2.74)ng/ml、(46.81±5.49)U/ml,放疗后各项标志物水平分别为(25.13±4.65)ng/ml、(12.35±4.18)ng/ml、(11.77±3.04)ng/ml、(39.67±4.63)U/ml,均明显低于放疗前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组放疗前血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CYFAR21-1、SCC、CA125水平分别为(46.87±5.93)ng/ml、(28.63±10.82)ng/ml、(26.46±8.68)ng/ml、(68.16±7.38)U/ml,放疗后各项标志物水平分别为(52.17±5.49)ng/ml、(46.72±11.75)ng/ml、(38.74±63.48)ng/ml、(87.34±8.16)U/ml,均明显高于放疗前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组放疗前各项标志物水平均低于对照组,差异显著(P<0.05);对照组放疗后标志物水平降低患者的近期疗效明显好于放疗后血清肿瘤标志物水平升高者,差异有统计学意义(χ2=76.45,P<0.05)。结论肿瘤血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CYFAR21-1、SCC、CA125的水平对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者放疗疗效具有评估价值。 Objective To explore the assessment value of serum level of tumor markers in efficacy of radiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer .Methods 176 cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer were divided into 2 groups:the observation group ( recent radiotherapy effective ) and the control group ( recent radiotherapy invalid ) , tumor serum CEA , CY-FAR21-1,SCC,CAl25 level before and after radiotherapy were detected by electrochemiluminescence .Results Effective rate of 176 cases of patients with radiotherapy was 58.0%,serum CEA,CYFAR21-1,SCC,CA125 levels in the observation group before radiotherapy were(33.65 ±5.41) ng/ml,(19.44 ±3.14) ng/ml,(16.87 ±2.74) ng/ml,(46.81 ±5.49) U/ml,the marker levels after radiotherapy were(25.13 ±4.65) ng/ml,(12.35 ±4.18) ng/ml,(11.77 ±3.04) ng/ml,(39.67 ±4.63) U/ml, which were significantly lower than those before radiotherapy ,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05);serum tumor markers CEA,CYFAR21-1,SCC,CA125 levels in the control group before radiotherapy were (46.87 ±5.93) ng/ml,(28.63 ± 10.82) ng/ml,(26.46 ±8.68) ng/ml,(68.16 ±7.38) U/ml,the markers levels after radiotherapy were (52.17 ±5.49) ng/ml,(46.72 ±11.75) ng/ml,(38.74 ±63.48) ng/ml,(87.34 ±8.16) U/ml,which were significantly higher than radiotherapy , the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05);the markers levels before radiotherapy in the observation group were lower than those of the control group,the difference was significant(P<0.05);short-term efficacy of patients in the control group with decreased markers levels was better than those with elevated marker levels after radiotherapy ,the difference was statistical signifi-cant(χ2 =76.45,P<0.05).Conclusion Serum tumor markers CEA,SCC,CYFAR21-1,CA125 levels has certain evaluation value in curative effect of advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy .
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2014年第9期1055-1057,1062,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 血清肿瘤标志物 晚期非小细胞肺癌 治疗效果 The serum tumor markers Advanced non-small cell lung cancer Treatment effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献70

共引文献169

同被引文献133

  • 1王颖轶,陈书长.肿瘤标志物对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者放疗疗效的评估价值[J].实用癌症杂志,2014,29(1):23-25. 被引量:12
  • 2陶冀,游廉,王锡山.乳腺癌肿瘤标志物CEA、CA15-3表达水平的临床意义[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(13):751-754. 被引量:21
  • 3高寒,姜军,杨新华,范林军,谢竞,周艳.5种血清标志物的不同组合对提高乳腺癌诊断的意义[J].第三军医大学学报,2007,29(12):1255-1257. 被引量:26
  • 4魏瑞,张阳德,何剪太,申良方,洪继东,伍海军.直肠癌的三维适形放疗及多肿瘤标志物的变化[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(16):913-916. 被引量:5
  • 5Pujol JL,Grenier J,Parrat E,et al.Cytokeratins as serum markers in lung cancer:a comparison of CYFRA 21-1 and TPS[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,1996,154(3 Pt 1):725-733.
  • 6Yang X,Wang D,Yang Z,et al.CEA is an Independent prognostic indicator that is associated with reduced survival and liver metas- tases in SCLC[J].Cell Biochem Biophys,2011,59(2):113-119.
  • 7Molina R,Filella X,Auge JM,et al.Tumor markers(CEA,CA 125,CYFRA 21-1,SCC and NSE)in patients with non-small cell lung cancer as an aid in histological diagnosis and prognosis.Compari- son with the main clinical and pathological prognostic factors[J].Tumour Biol,2003,24(4):209-218.
  • 8Wei X,Xu H,Kufe D.MUCl oncoprotein stabilizes and activates estrogen receptor alpha[J].Mol Cell,2006,21(2):295-305.
  • 9Bast RC Jr,Ravdin P,Hayes DF,et al.2000 update of recommen- dations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal can- cer:clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clini- cal Oncology[J].J Clin Oncol,2001,19(6):1865-1878.
  • 10Kievit J.Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer:numbers needed to test and treat[J].Eur J Cancer,2002,38(7):986-999.

引证文献15

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部