期刊文献+

腹腔镜下广泛性子宫切除术中盆腔自主神经不同处理方式的临床对比 被引量:4

Comparative Study of Different Treatment of Pelvic Autonomic Nerves in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下广泛性子宫切除术中盆腔自主神经不同处理方式的临床效果。方法选择的对象为2012年5月-2014年5月接受治疗的126例宫颈癌患者,根据患者在腹腔镜下广泛性子宫切除术中盆腔自主神经处理方式的不同将其分为对照组与观察组。对照组患者在腹腔镜广泛切除术中对盆腔神经不做特殊的处理;观察组患者在腹腔镜广泛切除术中保留盆腔自主神经。观察2组患者术中出血量、手术时间、下床活动时间以及住院时间;患者术后排便时间、肛门排气时间、膀胱容量以及拔除尿管时间;手术过程中常见不良反应的发生率。结果治疗后患者的下床活动时间对照组与观察组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术中出血量、手术时间以及住院时间都显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者与对照组患者在术后排便时间、肛门排气时间、膀胱容量以及拔除尿管时间方面进行比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组患者手术过程中常见不良反应(泌尿系统感染、手术感染、体重下降、排尿困难、腹部胀气、性功能障碍)的发生率为24.50%,观察组为9.43%,2组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下子宫切除术中保留盆腔神经的处理方式与不保留的处理方式相比,可以有效改善患者的手术情况,改善患者的膀胱和直肠功能,降低手术中并发症的发生率,值得对其进行进一步深入研究。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of different treatment of pelvic autonomic nerves in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Methods 126 cases of cervical cancer,according to different treatment of pelvic autonomic nerves in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy,were divided into the control group and the observation group. Pelvic autonomic nerves in the control group received no special treatment during laparoscopic resection; pelvic autonomic nerves in the observation group was preserved during laparoscopic resection. Intraoperative blood loss,surgery time,ambulation time,hospitalization time,postoperative defecation,flatus,bladder capacity,catheter removal time,incidence of adverse reactions of the 2 groups were observed. Results Ambulation time in the control group and the observation group after treatment had no significant differences( P > 0. 05); intraoperative blood loss,surgery time,and hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group,there had significant difference( P < 0. 05); postoperative defecation,flatus,bladder capacity and catheter removal time between the 2 groups had significant difference( P < 0. 05); common adverse reactions in the control group( urinary tract infections,surgical infections,weight loss,difficulty urinating,abdominal bloating,sexual dysfunction) was 24. 50%,and that of the observation group was 9. 43%,the 2 groups had significant difference( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy can effectively improve surgical outcome,bladder and rectum function,reduce the incidence of adverse reactions,and it is worthy of further study.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2015年第7期1013-1015,共3页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 腹腔镜 子宫切除术 盆腔自主神经 处理方式 Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Pelvic autonomic nerve Approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献98

  • 1耿毅.宫颈癌手术百年发展历程[J].肿瘤学杂志,2004,10(5):289-292. 被引量:14
  • 2臧荣余,程玺,汤洁,杨慧娟.子宫次广泛/广泛切除手术保留盆腔植物神经对膀胱功能恢复保护作用的初步观察[J].现代妇产科进展,2006,15(10):773-775. 被引量:21
  • 3张勇,孙华,王小燕,张明霞,齐成秋,李燕华,王丹,王亮.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫癌114例临床疗效比较[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2007,12(2):96-98. 被引量:2
  • 4Zutlo MA, lganci N, Angioli R, et al. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.-B critical ibaview[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2003,48 : 287-293.
  • 5Hazewinkel MH,Sprangers MA, van der Velden J, et al. Long-term cervical cancer survivors suffer from pelvic floor symptoms: across-sectional matched cohort study [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2010,117 (2) : 281-286.
  • 6Hockel M, Konerding MA, Heussel CP. Liposuetion-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study [J]. Am J Obstet Gyneeol,1998,178(5) : 971-976.
  • 7Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, et al. Identification and preservation of themotoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy typeⅢ[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2000,79 (2) : 154-157.
  • 8Sakuragi N, Todo Y, Kudo M, et al. A systematic nervesparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2005,15 (2): 387-397.
  • 9Tillaart SA, Kenter GG, Peters AA, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: local recurrence rate, feasibility, and safety in cervical cancer patients stage Ⅰ A to Ⅱ A[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2009,19(1) :39-45.
  • 10Jackson KS,Das N, Naik R, et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer:cancer: a match controlled study [J]. Gynecol Oncol,2004,95 : 655-661.

共引文献80

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部