期刊文献+

右美托咪定用于烧伤伴高血压患者削痂植皮术中的镇静效果分析 被引量:13

Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for sedation in tangential excision and skin grafting for burn injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨右美托咪定用于烧伤削痂植皮手术中的临床镇静效果。方法选取2014年1月—2017年12月在湖州市第一人民医院行削痂手术烧伤伴高血压患者60例,随机数字法分成对照组和治疗组,每组30例患者。入组患者术前20 min均静注0.5 mg盐酸戊乙奎醚,对照组患者进行常规手术麻醉,治疗组患者在常规手术麻醉基础上,在术前15 min静注右美托咪定。结果诱导后10 min,治疗组镇静评分高于对照组,氧饱和度低于对照组,治疗组呼吸频率高于对照组,组间差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对照组患者单位时间丙泊酚维持量为(3.9±0.8)mg/(kg·h),治疗组为(1.7±0.4)mg/(kg·h),对照组和治疗组氯胺酮维持剂量分别为(3.5±0.6)mg/(kg·h)和(1.4±0.3)mg/(kg·h),2组间差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。在削痂、取皮及植皮时刻,治疗组心率及收缩压显著低于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。治疗组患者不良反应发生率比对照组低,手术后清醒时间明显比对照组短,组间差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对照组和治疗组手术时间分别为(151.6±71.3)min和(161.8±69.3)min,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论静注右美托咪定注射液能够在镇静基础上节省异丙酚和氯胺酮药物剂量,在手术期间患者血流动力学及呼吸更稳定,手术后患者清醒时间较短,不良反应发生率降低。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for sedation in tangential excision and skin grafting for burn treatment. Methods A total of 60 hypertension patients with burns undergoing tangential excision and skin grafting in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were enrolled into this study and randomly divided into control group and treatment group with 30 patients in each group. All the selected patients were administrated with 0.5 mg penehyclidine hydrochloride intravenously 20 minutes before surgery. The control group received the routine surgical anesthesia, while the treatment group received intravenous injection of dexmedetomidine 15 min before the surgery on the basis of routine anesthesia. Results The level of sedation scores at 10 minutes after induction in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group, the oxygen saturation in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group, however, the respiratory rate in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). The maintenance dose of propofol per unit time was(3.9±0.8) mg/(kg·h) in the control group, and(1.7±0.4) mg/(kg·h) in the treatment group, of ketamine was(3.5±0.6) mg/(kg·h) in the control group and(1.4±0.3) mg/(kg·h) in the treatment group, respectively, the difference was statistically significant(all P<0.05). During the excision of the scab, skin harvest and skin grafting, the heart rate and systolic blood pressure in the treatment group was significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(all P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group, the l wake-up time after surgery was significantly shorter than that in the control group, and the differences was statistically significant(all P<0.05). The surgery duration of the control group and the treatment group were(151.6±71.3) min and(161.8±69.3) min, respectively, with no significant difference(P>0.05). Conclusion The intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine can save the dose of propofol and ketamine on the base of sedation. The hemodynamics and respiration of the patients keep stablely during the operation. It can also shorten the waking-up time and decrease the incidence of adverse reaction.
作者 朱涛 陈玲阳 ZHU Tao;CHEN Ling-yang(Department of Anesthesiology,the First People's Hospital of Huzhou,Huzhou,Zhejiang 313000,China)
出处 《中华全科医学》 2019年第3期388-391,454,共5页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2017KY162)
关键词 右美托咪定 高血压 烧伤 血痂植皮术 镇静 Dexmedetomidine Hypertension Burns Tangential excision and skin grafting Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for sedation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献100

  • 1杨少华,陈美丽,陈玲燕.右美托咪定复合氯胺酮的麻醉效果观察[J].江西医药,2013,48(4):357-358. 被引量:6
  • 2徐崇新.氯胺酮合并异丙酚在大面积烧伤手术中的应用[J].浙江创伤外科,2005,10(5):387-387. 被引量:2
  • 3Chun SY, Kim KO, Park DS, et al. Safety and efficacy of deep sedation with propofol alone or combined with midazolam administrated by nonanesthesiologist for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver,2012,6:464-470.
  • 4Kang K J, Min BH, Leem MJ, et al. Efficacy of Bispectral Index Monitoring for Midazolam and Meperidine Induced Sedation during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection : A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. Gut Liver,2011,5:160-164.
  • 5Breen D, Karabinis A, Malbrain M, et a[. Decreased duration ofmechanical ventilation when comparing analgesia-based sedation using remifentani! with standard hypnotic-based sedation for up to 10 days in intensive care unit patients: a randomised trial [ ISRCTN47583497 ]. Crit Care ,2005,9 : R200-210.
  • 6Pandharipande P, Jackson J, Ely W. Delirium: acute cognitive dysfunction in the critically ill. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2005,11: 360-368.
  • 7A algey, R Aksu, C Bicer, et al. Is the Addition of Dexmedeto midine to a Ketamine-Propofol Combination in Pediatric Cardiac Catheteriza- tion Sedation Useful[ J]. Pediatr Cardiol,2012,33 (5) :770-774.
  • 8S Koruk,A Mizrak,R Gul, et al. Dexmedetomidine-ketamine and mid- azolam -ketamine combinations for sedation in pediatric patients under- going extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized prospective study[J]. J Anesth,2010,24(6) :858-863.
  • 9EA Kose, M Honca, E Yilmaz,et al. Comparison of Effects of Dex-ket- amine and Dex-midazolam Combinations in Transurethral Procedures [J]. Urology,2012,79(6) :1214-1219.
  • 10M Mahmoud, T Tyler, S Sadhasivam. Dexmedetomidine and ketamine for large anterior mediastinal mass biopsy [ J ]. Pediatric Anesthesia, 2008,18(10) :1011-1013.

共引文献99

同被引文献144

引证文献13

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部