摘要
目的对比分析加压交锁钉与静力交锁钉治疗下肢长骨骨折患者的临床效果。方法选取该院2017年1月—2018年1月收治的下肢长骨骨折患者78例进行研究,以随机数字表法分为对照组(n=39)和观察组(n=39),对照组采用静力交锁钉治疗,观察组采用加压交锁钉治疗。对比两组临床治疗效果。结果观察组患者术后生活质量评分、关节功能评分、骨折愈合总有效率显著高于对照组,疼痛程度评分、并发症发生率比对照组组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在长骨骨折患者临床中采用加压交锁钉治疗,患者的骨折固定效果显著,提高了患者生活质量,不良反应下降,具有较高的临床应用价值。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effect of compression interlocking nail and static interlocking nail in the treatment of lower extremity long bone fracture. Methods From January 2017 to January 2018,a total of 78 patients with long bone fracture of lower extremity treated in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups: control group(n=39) and observation group(n=39). The control group was treated with static locking nail, and the observation group was treated with pressure interlocking nail. To compare the effect of clinical treatment between the two groups.Results The quality of life score, joint function score and the total effective rate of fracture healing in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The score of pain degree and the incidence of complications were lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of long bone fracture patients with compression interlocking nail, the effect of fracture fixation is remarkable, the quality of life of patients is improved, the adverse reaction is decreased, and it has high clinical application value.
作者
李国忠
LI Guozhong(Rongcheng Shidao whole Bone Hospital,Rongcheng Shandong,264309,China)
出处
《双足与保健》
2019年第3期39-40,97,共3页
Biped and Health
关键词
加压交锁钉
静力交锁钉
下肢长骨骨折
临床效果
Compression interlocking nail
Static interlocking nail
Long bone fracture of lower extremity
Clinical effect