踝关节运动性损伤的DR、CT诊断价值探讨

Diagnostic Value of DR and CT in Ankle Joint Injury

目的探究DR、CT在踝关节运动性损伤中的诊断价值。方法以2018年1—12月为研究时间段,将该时间段在我院诊治的踝关节运动性损伤患者60例作为研究对象,患者有明确的踝关节外伤史,接受DR、CT检查,对比患者两种检查方式的诊断结果,评价其临床应用价值。结果在内踝、外踝、胫骨下段前结节损伤检出率上,DR、CT差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但是在后踝损伤检出率上,DR显著低于CT,两组数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相较于DR,CT能够更准确地检出踝关节运动性损伤患者内踝、外踝、胫骨下段前结节、后踝损伤情况,值得在临床实践中推广应用。

Objective To explore the diagnostic value of DR and CT in ankle joint motion injury.Methods From January to December 2018,60 patients with ankle motion injuries treated in our hospital were studied.The patients had a clear history of ankle injuries.They underwent DR and CT examinations.The diagnostic results of the two examinations were compared and their clinical value was evaluated.Results There was no significant difference between DR and CT in the detection rate of anterior tubercle injury of medial malleolus,lateral malleolus and lower tibia(P>0.05),but DR was significantly lower than CT in the detection rate of posterior malleolus injury(P<0.05),and there was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with DR,CT can more accurately detect the injury of medial malleolus,lateral malleolus,anterior tubercle of lower tibia and posterior malleolus in patients with ankle joint motion injury,which is worthy of popularization and application in clinical practice.