期刊文献+

小剂量异丙酚用于老年机械通气患者镇静效果的临床观察

Clinical observation of the effect of small propofol on old patients with mechanical ventilation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨小剂量异丙酚在老年危重病人机械通气时的应用。方法 对 32例术后需呼吸机辅助通气的老年患者随机分两组 :对照组 (异丙酚常规用量 ) 1 8例 ,研究组 (小剂量异丙酚 ) 1 4例 ,分别在镇静前给一定的异丙酚负荷量。对照组给异丙酚 40~ 1 0 0 mg,研究组给异丙酚 2 0~60 mg,均在 5~ 1 0 min内推注完 ,随后对照组以异丙酚 1~ 5mg/ kg· h- 1 ,研究组以异丙酚 0 .3~ 1 .5mg/ kg· h- 1分别采用微量泵持续泵入。结果 静注后两组镇静效果达到 Ramsay氏 ~ 级所需时间 :对照组 (1 5± 5) s,研究组 (2 0± 9) s,两组比较无差异 (P>0 .0 5) ;停药后神志恢复时间 :对照组 6~ 1 5min,研究组 35s~ 6min,两组比较有显著差异 (P<0 .0 5) ;两组病人用药前后 BP、HR、R、Sa O2 、Pa O2 、Pa CO2 和 CVP等均有明显改善 (P<0 .0 5) ,但组间差异无显著意义 ,两组病人用药后血压无明显差异 (P>0 .0 5)。结论 异丙酚以 0 .3~ 1 .5mg/ kg· h- 1滴注 ,用于 ICU老年危重患者可达到理想的镇静效果。 Objective Our purpose was to observe the effect of small propofol on old patients with mechanical ventilation.Methods 32 old patients who required mechanical ventilation after abdominal operation were admitted to ICU. 18 patients were assigned to common dose propofol (40~100 mg) and 14 patients to small propofol (20~60 mg). They have been injected for 5~10 min. Then common propofol (1~5 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 ) and small propofol (0.3~1.5 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 ) were given by countinuous infusion.Results After infusion, there were no significant different time to get Ramsay sedation Level Ⅳ~Ⅴ. Compare sedative time was (15±5)s, and research sedative time was (20±9) s ( P >0.05). After stopping giving propofol, compare recovered time was 6~15 min, and research time was 35 s~6 min ( P <0.05). Moreover, the patients' BP, HR, R, SaO 2, PaO 2, PaCO 2 and CVP were better than before ( P <0.05). There were no difference between two groups ( P >0.05).Conclusions Small propfol have a remarkable effect with the mechanical ventilation old patients.
出处 《中国老年学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第8期521-522,共2页 Chinese Journal of Gerontology
关键词 小剂量 异丙酚 老年人 机械通气 镇静 临床观察 危重病人 Propofol Mechanical ventilation Old patients
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献4

  • 1[1]Cockshott ID. Propofol('Diprivan')pharmacokinetics and metabolism-an overview. Postgrad Med J,1985,61(Suppl 3):45~50.
  • 2[2]Aitkenhead Alan R,Peppernan Michael L,Willatts Sheila M,et al. Comparison of propofol and midazolam for sedation in critically ill patients. Lancet,1989,232(8665):704~709.
  • 3卢玉平,国外医学.麻醉学与复苏分册,1997年,18卷,5期,298页
  • 4盛卓人,实用临床麻醉学(第3版),1996年,127页

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部