1Letic Gavrilovic A,et al.Genetic potential of interfacial guided osteogenesis in implant devices.Dental Materials.Journal,2000,19(2):99-132
2Gough JE,Downes,S.Osteoblast cell death on methacry.late polymers involves apoptosis.Journal of Biomedical Materials Ressarch,2001,57(2):291-299
3Mayr Wohlfart U,et al.Proliferation and differentiation rates of a human osteoblast-like cell line(SaOS-2)in contact with different bone substitute materials.Journal of Biomedical Materials Research,2001,57(1):132-139
4Silver IA,et al.Interactions of bilactive glasses with osteoblasts in vitro:effects of 45S5 bioglass, and 58S and 77S bioactive glasses on metabolism,intracelluar ion concentrations and cell viability.Biomaterials.2001,22(2):175-185
5Bannister SR,et al.Shear foroe modulates osteoblast response to suface roughness.Journal of Biomedical Materials Research,2002,60(1):167-174
6Li D,et al.Bone interface of dental implants cytologically influenced by a modified sandblasted surface:a priliminary in vitro study.Implant Denistry,2001,10(2):132-138
7de Ruijter JE,et al.Analysis of integrin expression in U2OS cells cultured on various calcium phosphate ceramic substrates.Tissue Engineering.2001,7(3):279-89
8Ohgaki M,et al.Manipulation of selective cell adhesion and growth by surface charges of electrically polarized hydroxyapatite.Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.2001,57(3):366-373
9Webster TJ,et al.Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics.Biomaterials.2000,21(17):1803-1810
10Webster TJ,et al.Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics.Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.2000,51(3):475-483