期刊文献+

作保灵对磺酰脲类除草剂解毒效应的研究 被引量:3

Detoxification of TNA to Sulfonylurea Herbicides
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用田间试验方法研究保护剂对磺酰脲类除草剂解毒效应。作保灵浸种和拌种处理能保护玉米免受豆磺隆残留药害,而且拌种处理优于浸种处理;玉米不同品种对绿磺隆残留反应不同,不同品种间作保灵对绿磺隆解毒作用有差异;作保灵拌种对玉米生长发育无任何影响。 This paper presented the research on detoxification with antidote to residual sulfonylurea herbicides in greenhouse and field tests.There was good protection to corn from residual damaging of chlorimuron-ethyl by TNA blend and soaked seeds of corn.Effect of the blend seeds was better than that of the soaked seeds.There was different reaction for each distinct corn variety to residual chlorsulfuron.Detoxification of TNA was different among the tested corn varieties.There was no influence to the growth of corn by TNA blend seeds.
作者 栾凤侠 陶波
出处 《玉米科学》 CAS CSCD 2003年第3期80-81,101,共3页 Journal of Maize Sciences
关键词 作保灵 磺酰脲类除草剂 解毒效应 浸种 拌种 生长发育 玉米 TNA Sulfonylurea herbicides Chlorsulfuron Chlorimuron-ethyl Detoxification
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1陶波 苏少泉.安全剂对绿磺隆解毒效应的研究[J].杂草学报,1993,7(4):1-6.
  • 2陶波 何钟佩 等.豆磺隆在土壤中残留动态及对后荐作物的影响[J].西北植物学报,2000,20(6):1229-1233.
  • 3陶波,何钟佩.作保灵(TNA)对大豆保护效应及机制的研究[J].大豆科学,2000,19(2):189-192. 被引量:5
  • 4Anderson, et al. Residual phytotoxiclty of chlorsulfuron in soil [J] .Jmual of Enviro. Quality, 1985, 14: 111-113.

二级参考文献5

  • 1陶波 苏少泉.保护剂对绿磺隆的解毒效应的研究[J].杂草学报,1993,7(4):1-6.
  • 2张新颜.除草剂解毒剂-选择性化学除草剂一种新途径[J].辽宁杂草科学,1986,(4):62-64.
  • 3陶波,杂草学报,1993年,7卷,4期,1页
  • 4张新颜,辽宁杂草科学,1986年,4期,62页
  • 5陶波.作物保护剂对磺酰脲类除草剂解毒效应述评[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1999,30(3):361-364. 被引量:9

共引文献4

同被引文献29

  • 1谢志南,林丽仙,钟赞华,赖瑞云,苏明华.毒死蜱对番木瓜生理生化及植株生长的影响[J].热带作物学报,2009,30(4):479-484. 被引量:7
  • 2周小毛,黄雄英,柏连阳,胡美英,罗红兵.芸苔素内酯保护玉米免受胺苯磺隆伤害的作用及其机理[J].植物保护学报,2005,32(2):189-194. 被引量:25
  • 3陈泽鹏,邓建朝,万树青,王静,詹振寿.二氯喹啉酸致烟草畸形的解毒剂筛选与解毒效果[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):453-456. 被引量:46
  • 4陶波,胡凡.杂草化学防除[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2009.
  • 5Rauch B J, Bellinder R R, Brainard D C, et al. Dissipation of fome- safen in New York State soils and potential to cause carryover injury to sweet corn[J]. Weed Technology, 2007, 21(1): 206-212.
  • 6Duke S O, Lydon J, Becerril J M, et al. Protoporphyrinogen oxi- dase-inhibiting herbicides[J]. Weed Science, 1991, 39(3): 465-473.
  • 7Boger P, Wakabayashi K, Hirai phyrinogen oxidase a brief update, [M]. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer. K, et al. Inhibito of protopor- Herbicide Classes in Development 2002.
  • 8Ziska L H, McClung A. Differential response of cultivated and weedy(red) rice to recent and projected increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide EJ~. Agronomy Journal,2008,100(5) :1259 - 1263.
  • 9Preecha P. Seed morphological traits and genotypic diversity o{ weedy rice (Oryza sativa f. spontanea) populations found in the Thai Horn Mali rice field of northeastern Thailand EJ ~.Weed Biology and Management, 2009, 9(1) ~ 1 - 9.
  • 10Taylor V L, Cummins I, Edwards R, et al. Protective respon- ses induced by herbicide safeners in wheat EJ~. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2013, 88= 93- 99.

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部