生命与存在:陶瓷艺术批评的不可通约性

Life and existence: the incommensurability of ceramic art criticism

陶瓷艺术批评的现实困境不是简单的失语与缺席,而是批评方向的迷失。当下的陶瓷艺术批评从话语的使用到文本的呈现,基本是在美术、设计等异域批评环境中生成的。所以,这种批评往往是站在异域立场,对陶瓷艺术的反身观照,这种我与他者之间具有可通约性的批评文本,其目光只能在艺术的普遍规律层面上进行"艺术概论"式扫描,它难以深入至"陶瓷之所以为陶瓷"的内部体系中实现高适配度的批评,也不可能衍生出合乎陶瓷艺术本质属性的评价体系建构。它以其不知"我是谁"的暧昧性,从根本上不能对陶瓷艺术的身份及其形成机理进行准确描述,遑论对其深入而准确的批评。本文认为:无论陶瓷艺术批评的体系如何繁芜与庞杂,有一个基本观照点不可更易,即不可通约性。

The realistic predicament of ceramic art criticism is not simply aphasia and absence,but the loss of direction of criticism.Current ceramic art criticism,from the use of discourse to the presentation of text,is basically generated in the foreign critical environment of art and design.Therefore,this kind of criticism often stands on an exotic position and reflects on the ceramic art.This kind of criticism text,which is comparable between me and others,can only be scanned on the level of the general law of art.It is difficult to penetrate into the criticism of'why ceramics are ceramics'to achieve a high degree of suitability in the internal system,and it is impossible to derive a coincidence.Establishment of the evaluation system of the essential attributes of ceramic art.Because of its ambiguity of not knowing who I am,it can not accurately describe the identity of ceramic art and its formation mechanism,let alone criticize it thoroughly and accurately.This paper holds that no matter how complicated and complicated the system of ceramic art criticism is,it is not easy to have a basic point of view,that is,incommensurability.