期刊文献+

清肝解郁方对偏头痛患者基于患者报告的结局(PRO)评价量表的临床研究 被引量:4

Study of Qinggan Jieyu herbal formula granule on migraine with the patients-reported outcomes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]在清肝解郁方治疗偏头痛的随机对照临床研究中,应用偏头痛缓解期基于患者报告的结局(PRO)评价量表,对偏头痛患者进行综合评价。[方法]采用随机对照的试验设计,纳入60例患者,治疗4周后,对头痛情况、躯体症状、精神心理状态、功能状态4个维度及头痛频次进行评价。[结果]1)治疗后两组头痛PRO量表各维度得分比较,躯体症状、精神心理状态及PRO总分比较有统计学差异。2)治疗前后两组PRO量表各项目得分变化率组间比较,精神心理状态、功能状态及总分均有统计学意义。3)治疗后,两组头痛发作次数减半率组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]PRO量表可以多维度的评价清肝解郁方治疗肝郁化热证偏头痛患者的临床疗效,尤其能对患者的主观精神心理状态的改善进行评价,可较全面地反应清肝解郁方治疗偏头痛肝郁化热证的效果。 [Objective] To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of Qinggan Jieyu herbal formula granule in the treatment of migraine with the patients-reported outcomes(PRO) scale. [Methods] In this randomized controlled trial, we recruited 60 eligible patients and gave then a 4-week treatment. After the treatment, we evaluated the four dimensions of the PRO scale and the migraine frequency. [Results]1)After treatment, compared the scores of each dimension of the migraine PRO scale, physical symptoms, mental status and total PRO scores had statistically significance between the two groups. 2)Compared the deviation of the baseline and the scores after treatment between two groups, mental status, functional status and PRO scores had statistically difference. 3)After treatment, the responder rate of migraine attack frequency had statistical significance between two groups(P<0.05). [Conclusion] PRO scale can evaluate the effects of Qinggan Jieyu herbal formula granule in the treatment of migraine from multiple aspects, especially in the improvement of the mental state of patients.
出处 《天津中医药》 CAS 2016年第9期517-520,共4页 Tianjin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81273688) 北京中医药大学创新团队项目(2011-CXTD-22)
关键词 清肝解郁方 偏头痛 肝郁化热证 PRO量表 Qinggan Jieyu herbal formula granule migraine patients-reported outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Rebecca C. Burch,Stephen Loder,Elizabeth Loder,Todd A. Smitherman.??The Prevalence and Burden of Migraine and Severe Headache in the U nited S tates: Updated Statistics From Government Health Surveillance Studies(J)Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain . 2015 (1)
  • 2Sun-Young Kim,Sung-Pa Park.??The role of headache chronicity among predictors contributing to quality of life in patients with migraine: a hospital-based study(J)The Journal of Headache and Pain . 2014 (1)
  • 3Ettore Beghi,Gennaro Bussone,Domenico D’Amico,Pietro Cortelli,Sabina Cevoli,Gian Camillo Manzoni,Paola Torelli,Maria Clara Tonini,Giovanni Allais,Roberto Simone,Florindo D’Onofrio,Sergio Genco,Franca Moschiano,Massimiliano Beghi,Sara Salvi.??Headache, anxiety and depressive disorders: the HADAS study(J)The Journal of Headache and Pain . 2010 (2)
  • 4曹克刚,孙凡,顾兆一,刘志勇,洪雨,陈雷.偏头痛缓解期基于患者报告的结局评价量表的性能考评研究[J].世界临床药物,2014,35(1):15-19. 被引量:7
  • 5俞丽华,邹忆怀,曹克刚.偏头痛临床疗效评价现状思考[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2010,16(12):1194-1195. 被引量:4
  • 6何庆勇,王阶,施展,熊兴江.冠心病心绞痛中医PRO疗效评价量表理论结构模型构想[J].中华中医药杂志,2010,25(1):42-45. 被引量:35
  • 7Lars Jacob Stovner,Colette Andree.Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project[J]. The Journal of Headache and Pain . 2010 (4)
  • 8陈洁,冼绍祥,刘凤斌.中医心系疾病PRO量表理论框架构建设想[J].新中医,2015,47(8):3-5. 被引量:3
  • 9ShengyuanYu,RuozhuoLiu,GangZhao,XiaosuYang,XiangyangQiao,JiachunFeng,YannanFang,XiutangCao,MianwangHe,TimothySteiner.??The Prevalence and Burden of Primary Headaches in China: A Population‐Based Door‐to‐Door Survey(J)Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain . 2012 (4)
  • 10Isabel Morgan,Francisco Eguia,Bizu Gelaye,B Lee Peterlin,Mahlet G Tadesse,Seblewengel Lemma,Yemane Berhane,Michelle A Williams.??Sleep disturbances and quality of life in Sub-Saharan African migraineurs(J)The Journal of Headache and Pain . 2015 (1)

二级参考文献80

共引文献134

同被引文献58

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部