期刊文献+

高新技术企业内外部学习策略选择对R&D绩效影响的比较分析

the Comparable Analysis on the R&D Performance Effects and the Shift of Internal and External Learning in High-tech Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来 ,高新技术企业的竞争更多的表现为连续、高效、敏捷的R&D核心能力的竞争。其中 ,加强和权衡内外部学习是前提与基础。本文结合对我国 4 8家高新技术企业的实证调研结果 ,旨在探究高新技术企业R&D流程在技术试验与产品开发两大阶段中不同的内外部学习策略选择对R&D速度、成本、竞争优势的影响。最后 ,本文针对高新技术企业内外部学习策略选择与R&D绩效的关系 。 Since the recent years,more and more competitions of high-tech enterprises demonstrate continuous,efficient,swift competition of the nuclear ability of R&D,the basic of which is to strengthen and balance internal and external learning.The article,based on the experience of 48 high-tech enterprises,researches and analyzes the R&D performance effects of the shift of internal and external learning in high-tech enterprises.In the end,the article refers to some questions to be researched further.
出处 《科学管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第5期59-63,共5页 Scientific Management Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ( 70 2 72 0 2 9)
关键词 高新技术企业 内部学习 外部学习 R&D绩效 核心能力 internal learning external learning R&D performance high-tech enterprise
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Eric H. Kessler, Paul E. Bierly and Shamhi Gopalakrishnan (2000) Internal VS. external learning in new product development: effects on speed, costs and competiiveadvantage. R&D Management,30,3.
  • 2Brown,J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 1, 40-57.
  • 3Hedberg, B. (1981) How organizations learn and unlearn. In Nystrom, P. C. and Starbuck, W. H.(eds) handbook of organization design: Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University press.
  • 4Huber. G.. P. (1990) Orginational learning: the contribution processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88-115.
  • 5Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1994) Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business school Press.
  • 6Kaz, R. and Allen, T. J. (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 51 R&D project groups. R&D management, 12, 7-9.
  • 7Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
  • 8Gopalakrishnan, S. and Sierly, P. (1997) Organizational innovations and strategic choices: a knowledge based view. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 422 - 426.
  • 9苏敬勤.产学研合作创新的交易成本及内外部化条件[J].科研管理,1999,20(5):68-72. 被引量:102
  • 10Barney, J. (1991) Firm resources and sustained.competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17,1, 99-119.

二级参考文献8

共引文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部