期刊文献+

钢筋混凝土框架结构位移放大系数能力分析 被引量:4

Capacity analysis for structural displacement amplification factor of reinforced concrete frames
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结构位移放大系数能力值是预测结构最大变形能力,确定结构之间最小距离,防止结构在地震作用时因相互碰撞而发生倒塌的关键设计参数。但是目前我国结构抗震规范中并没有引入结构位移放大系数的概念。考虑不同设防烈度,不同层数严格按现行抗震规范设计了17个典型RC框架结构,采用OpenSees进行有限元建模与分析,并采用结构振动台试验数据和拟静力试验数据对有限元模型进行验证。分别采用非线性静力方法和非线性动力方法,对所设计典型结构的地震反应进行了分析,得到了按现行抗震规范所设计结构的位移放大系数能力值的取值及其变化规律。分析结果表明,采用结构位移放大系数能力值,可以预测结构临界倒塌状态时的结构最大弹塑性变形。按我国现行抗震规范设计的VI、VII、VIII度RC框架结构,位移放大系数能力值的最小值分别为15、10、5,具有良好的变形能力。结构位移放大系数与结构反应修正系数的比值(Cd/R)在0.8~1.2范围内,这和NEHRP推荐条文中的取值相近,但稍微偏大。 'Capacity'value of structural displacement amplification factor( DAF) is a key factor in seismic design,since it can be used to estimate the maximum inelastic deformations developed in severe earthquakes,and to estimate the minimum building spacing to avoid the collapse due to their collision during the earthquake. DAF,however,hasn't been introduced in current Chinese seismic code. In this work,17 RC frame buildings are designed with different fortification intensities and with different floors according to current Chinese seismic Codes. These structures are further modeled and analyzed by OpenSees. By comparison with the quasi-static test data and the shaking table test data for RC frame structures,the OpenSees models are verified and validated. For these 17 RC frames,structural seismic response are analyzed by nonlinear static procedures( NSP) and nonlinear dynamic procedures( NDP),respectively,and the'capacity'values of structural displacement amplification factors as well as their variations are achieved. It is shown that by using 'capacity'values of structural displacement amplification factor,structural inelastic deformations at collapse limit state may be estimated. For RC frames designed with seismic fortification intensity VI,VII,VIII,the minimum'capacity'value of structural displacement amplification factor is 15,10 and 5,respectively,and the deformation ability of designed RC frame is good. The ratios between displacement amplification factors and response modification factors( i. e. Cd/R) range from 0. 8 to 1. 2,which are only slightly larger than the value recommended in NEHR Pprovisions.
出处 《土木工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期47-55,共9页 China Civil Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(51178150 50978080 90715021) 土木工程防灾国家重点实验室开放课题基金(SLDRCE12-MB-04) 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20112302110005)
关键词 结构位移放大系数能力值 结构振动台试验 钢筋混凝土结构 非线性静力分析方法 非线性动力分析方法 'capacity'values of structural displacement amplification factor shaking table test RC frame structures nonlinear static procedures nonlinear dynamic procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献42

  • 1肖明葵,王耀伟,严涛,赖明.抗震结构的弹塑性位移谱[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2000,22(z1):34-40. 被引量:13
  • 2翟长海,谢礼立,张敏政.工程结构等强度位移比谱研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2005,37(1):45-48. 被引量:9
  • 3童根树,赵永峰.动力P-Δ效应对地震力调整系数的影响[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2007,41(1):120-125. 被引量:17
  • 4黄宗明,孙勇.决定单自由度体系弹塑性地震反应的结构参数分析[J].重庆建筑大学学报,1996,18(3):42-48. 被引量:9
  • 5陈聃.抗震结构的延性谱.清华大学抗震抗爆工程研究报告集[M].清华大学出版社,1980..
  • 6韦承基.弹塑性结构的位移比谱[J].建筑结构学报,1986,4(1).
  • 7杨薄.基于位移的结构地震反应方法研究.重庆建筑大学博士学位论文[M].重庆,1999..
  • 8European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance [ S ]. Brussels: CEN, 2003.
  • 9Building Seismic Safety Council. FEMA450 (NEHRP) Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures Partl : Provisions [ S ]. Washington D C: Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, 2003.
  • 10International Code Council. Uniform Building Code 1997 [ S]. California: International Conference of Building Officials, 1997.

共引文献18

同被引文献33

  • 1孙国华,何若全,顾强,郁银泉,方有珍.半刚接钢框架内填RC墙结构超强及强度折减系数研究[J].北京工业大学学报,2009,35(10):1338-1343. 被引量:7
  • 2翟长海,谢礼立.钢筋混凝土框架结构超强研究[J].建筑结构学报,2007,28(1):101-106. 被引量:37
  • 3周靖,蔡健,方小丹.钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震超强系数分析[J].世界地震工程,2007,23(4):227-233. 被引量:12
  • 4Farahi M, Mofid M. On the quantification of seismic performance factors of chevron knee bracings, in steel structures [J]. Engineering Structures ,2013,46 : 155 - 164.
  • 5Izadinia M, Rahgozar M A, Mohammadrezaei O. Response modification factor for steel mo- ment-resisting frames by different pushover a- nalysis methods [ J ]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2012,79:83 - 90.
  • 6Mahmoudi M, Zaree M. Evaluating response modification factors of concentrically braced steel frames[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010,66 : 1196 - 1204.
  • 7Mahmoudi M, Zaree M. Determination the re- sponse modification factors of buckling re- strained braced frame [J].Proceed Engineer- ing,2013,54:222 - 231.
  • 8Asgarian B, Shokrgozar H R. BRBF response modification factor [ J ]. Journal of Construc- tional Steel Research ,2009,65:290 - 298.
  • 9Kurban C O,Topkaya C. A numerical study on response modification, overstrength and dis- placement amplification factors for steel plate shear wall systems [J]. Earthquake Engineer- ing and Structural Dynamics, 2009,38 : 497 - 516.
  • 10Mehanny S S F,E1Howary H A. Assessment of RC moment frame buildings in moderate seis- mic zones:evaluation of egyptian seismic code implications and system configuration effects [ J]. Engineering Structures, 2010,32 : 2394 - 2406.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部