期刊文献+

预制混凝土双板剪力墙抗震性能试验 被引量:14

Seismic behavior test for double-wall precast concrete shear wall
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为评价预制混凝土双板(DWPC)剪力墙的抗震性能,对2个DWPC剪力墙和1个现浇剪力墙的足尺比例试件在轴压比为0.1的条件下进行低周反复荷载对比试验研究,较系统地分析两类试件的滞回曲线、骨架曲线、位移延性、刚度退化及耗能能力等。结果表明,3个试件均发生弯曲破坏;经过构造改进的DWPC剪力墙具有良好的整体工作性能;在边缘构件U形筋搭接连接范围设置3重连续复合螺旋箍筋加强对核心区混凝土的约束作用,提高DWPC剪力墙的刚度和承载能力,其中极限荷载提高了22%~23%,但DWPC剪力墙的位移延性系数降低到5;DWPC剪力墙的耗能能力在试件屈服前与现浇剪力墙接近或相同,屈服后略有降低。 To evaluate the seismic behavior of double-wall precast concrete(DWPC) shear wall, three full scale specimens are tested and compared under low-cyclic reversed loading with axial compression ratio of 0.1, including two DWPC shear walls and one cast-in-situ shear wall. Some systematic analyses were made on hysteretic curves, skeleton curves, displacement ductility coefficients, bearing capacity, stiffness degradation and energy dissipation capacity of specimens. The results show that all specimens fail in bending. The improved DWPC shear walls can work together well. The three continuous circular spiral stirrups in the range of U-shaped connection steel bars confine the boundary element concrete; also improve the stiffness and bearing capacity of DWPC shear walls. The ultimate loads of DWPC shear walls increased by 22% to 23%. But the displacement ductility ratios reduced to 5. The energy dissipation capacities of DWPC specimens are basically the same within the elastic range and are lower than those of cast-in-situ specimen beyond the elastic range. All the specimens have shown favorable seismic performance.
机构地区 东南大学
出处 《土木工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第S2期151-157,共7页 China Civil Engineering Journal
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划(2011BAJ10B03) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2242014Y10030) 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划(CXLX13_105) 江苏省产学研前瞻性联合研究项目(BY2014127-05)
关键词 预制混凝土双板剪力墙 低周反复荷载试验 抗震性能 承载力 延性 耗能 double-wall precast concrete shear wall low-cyclic reversed loading experiment seismic behavior bearing capacity ductility energy dissipation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献33

  • 1梁桂保,张友志.浅谈我国装配式住宅的发展进程[J].重庆工学院学报,2006,20(9):50-52. 被引量:49
  • 2孙巍巍,孟少平.后张无粘结预应力装配混凝土联肢抗震墙的连梁组合体抗侧性能[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,37(2):190-194. 被引量:12
  • 3YERLICI V A, TURAN O. Factors affecting anchorage bond strength in high -performance concrete [ J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2000,97 (3) :499 - 507.
  • 4ENRICO S, SUCHART L. Responses of reinforced concrete members including bond - slip effects[J].ACI Structural Journal, 2000, 97 (6) : 831 - 839.
  • 5ALMEIDA de F, MENEZES F,DEBS E, et al. Bond - slip behavior of self - compacting concrete and vi- brated concrete using pull - out and beam tests [ J ]. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 2008, 41 (6) : 1073 - 1089.
  • 6WILSON J L, ROBINSON A J, BALENDRA T. Performance of precast concrete load - bearing panel structures in regions of low to moderate seismicity [ J]. Engineering Structures, 2008,30 (7) : 1831 - 1842.
  • 7KURAMA Y C. Precast/prestressed concrete structures under natural and human - made hazards: special issue [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007,133 ( 11 ) : 1487 - 1488.
  • 8MORGEN B G, KURAMA Y C. Seismic design of friction- damped prccast concrete frame structures [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133 (11):1501 -1511.
  • 9Shen Q, Kurama Y C. Lateral load behavior of unbonded post-tensioned hybrid coupled walls [ C ]//Proceedings of the 6th ASCCS International Conference on Steel-Concrete Composite Structures. Composite and Hybrid Structures, 2000:793 -800.
  • 10Kurama Y C, Sause R, Pessiki S, et al. Seismic response evaluation of unbonded post-tensioned precast walls [ J ]. ACI Structural Journal, 2002,99 (5) : 641-651.

共引文献270

同被引文献122

引证文献14

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部