摘要
目前结构性态地震工程中易损性曲线传统计算流程对强震记录选取不够重视,鲜有对目标场址地震概率危险性的考虑,因而以同时考虑地震概率危险性和结构自振周期特性的条件均值谱作为记录选取依据,将结果应用到IDA方法和条带法中,并与地震事件随机散布的传统云图法进行对比。以某八层平面框架作为算例,将云图法与IDA方法以及条带法在四种极限状态下的结构需求易损性曲线以及结构需求概率危险性曲线进行对比分析。其中,随机选取两组地震事件(M,R)分布范围相仿的强震记录进行云图法计算,二者结果由于不可控的地震动不确定性而存在显著差异,但IDA方法与条带法由于采用条件均值谱对地震动进行了控制,彼此结果基本一致,更符合实际工程场址的危险性需求,同时为后期不同区域的结构性态分析损失评估提供了依据。
The ground-motion selection is neglected on the traditional fragility demand curve of structural seismic engineering, and the seismic hazard is rarely considered. The conditional mean spectrum(CMS) ground-motion selection method was introduced into the IDA method and stripe method to solve the problem, and compared with the traditional cloud method with disperse ground-motion records. Conditional mean spectrum was constructed based on the China seismic disaggregation result and attenuation relationship. The fragility demand curves and the demand hazard curves of one eight-stories 2D structure were computed using the three different methods. With the two different ground-motion records selection as the input of the traditional cloud method, the two group results are significant variation. Considering the merit of CMS selection in IDA method and stripe method, the results are coherence and could be applied in the subsequent loss estimation study in performance based earthquake engineering.
作者
温瑞智
尹建华
冀昆
任叶飞
Wen Ruizhi;Yin Jianhua;Ji Kun;Ren Yefei(Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China;Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China)
出处
《土木工程学报》
EI
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第S2期35-40,47,共7页
China Civil Engineering Journal
基金
国家重点研发计划(2017YFC1500801)
国家自然科学基金(51778589
51308515)
黑龙江省自然科学基金(E2017065)
关键词
条件均值谱
结构需求易损性
地震危险性
结构需求概率危险性
conditional mean spectrum
structural fragility demand curve
seismic hazard
structural demand hazard curve