期刊文献+

基于“precision-recall”曲线分析的?高被引论文识别研究 被引量:2

Research on the Recognition of Highly Cited Papers Based on “Precision-recall” Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章首先对高被引论文识别的现状、问题进行梳理和分析,在此基础上,选取地球物理学、计算机与自动化、力学、图书情报学和药学5个学科的90本中文核心期刊在2004-2016年间刊载的448 749篇研究文献,将高被引论文识别问题转化为信息检索问题,利用文献下载量(DS)和期刊引用分数(JCS)两个指标对高被引论文进行识别,并引入新的观测视角——"precisionrecall"曲线,对识别效果进行分析和可视化。结果表明,"precision-recall"曲线可以较好地对指标的高被引论文识别能力进行直观反映;文献下载量和期刊引用分数均可作为高被引论文识别指标,且文献下载量的高被引论文识别能力优于期刊引用分数。 This article first summarized the status and problems existing in identifying highly cited papers,on the basis of which,we assumed that the number of download could be an indicator for identifying highly cited papers.To test the hypothesis,we manually collected 448 749 articles published in 90 core journals between 2004-2016 from the fields of geophysics,computers and automation,mechanics,library and information science,and pharmacy.We depicted the density of downloads and citations of these articles by using statistics.Then,we converted the problem of identifying highly cited papers into a problem of information retrieval,and used the Download Score(DS)and Journal Citation Score(JCS)to score and rank the papers.Finally,precision-recall curve was utilized to analyze and visualize results.Both indicators were proved to be functional to identify highly cited papers,with the DS more effective than JCS.
作者 李信 程齐凯 Li Xin;Cheng Qikai(School of Information Management,Wuhan University;Institute for Academic Evaluation and Development,East China Normal University)
出处 《图书馆杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期83-90,共8页 Library Journal
基金 华东师范大学学术评价与促进研究中心2017年开放项目"面向学术文本深度语义挖掘的学术评价方法创新研究"(编号:IAED2017B04)的研究成果之一
关键词 高被引论文“precision-recall”曲线 文献下载量 期刊引用分数 补充指标 Highly cited papers Precision-recall curve Download score Journal citation score Supplementary indicator
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献114

  • 1王欣,钟萍.《中华显微外科杂志》载文被引分析[J].中华显微外科杂志,2004,27(3):238-239. 被引量:9
  • 2万锦堃,花平寰,孙秀坤.期刊论文被引用及其Web全文下载的文献计量分析[J].现代图书情报技术,2005(4):58-62. 被引量:82
  • 3庞景安.中文科技期刊下载计量指标与引用计量指标的比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,2006,29(1):44-48. 被引量:42
  • 4Garfield E.Citation indexes for science.A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.Science,1955,122(3159):108-111.
  • 5Garfield E.Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies.Science,1972,178(60):471-479.
  • 6Holden G,Rosenberg G,Barker K,Onghena P.Should decisions about your hiring,reappointment,tenure,or promotion use the impact factor score as a proxy indicator of the impact of your scholarship?Medscape General Medicine,2006,8(3):21.
  • 7Smith R.Commentary:the power of the unrelenting impact facto--is it a force for good or harm? International Journal of Epidemiology,2006,35:1129-130.
  • 8Garfield E.The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.JAMA,2006,295(1):90-93.
  • 9Garfield E. Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 1955 , 122 (3159) :108 - 111.
  • 10Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 1972,178(60) :471 -479.

共引文献383

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部