1Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P. The mental repre- sentation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1993, 122(3): 371-396.
2Fischer M H, Rottmann J. Do negative numbers have a place on the mental number line? Psychology Sci- ence, 2005, 47(1): 22-32.
3Bull R, Marschark M, Blatto-Vallee G. SNARC hunting: Examining number representation in deaf stu- dents. Learning and Individual Differences, 2005, 15 (1) : 223-236.
4Nuerk H-C, Bauer F, Krnmmenacher J, Heller D, Willmes K. The power of the mental number line: How the magnitude of unattended numbers affects per- formance in an Eriksen task. Psychological Science, 2005, 47 (1): 34-50.
5Nuerk H-C, Wood G, Willmes K. The universal SNARC effect, the association between number magni- tude and space is amodal. Experimental Psychology, 2005, 52(3) : 187-194.
6Gevers W, Ratinckx E, De Baene W, Fias W. Fur- ther evidence that the SNARC effect is processed a-long a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lat- eralized readiness potential. Experimental Psychology, 2006, 53(1): 58-68.
7Nuerk H-C, Weger, Willmes U, Willmes K. Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 2001, 82 (1) : 25-33.
8Hubbard E M, Piazza M, Pinel P, Dehaene S. Inter- actions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2005, 6(1): 435-448.
9Gevers W, Lammertyn J. The hunt for SNARC. Psy- chology Science, 2005, 47(1): 10-21.
10Gevers W, Reynvoet B, Fias W. The mental repre- sentation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 2003. 87(1) : 87-95.
