期刊文献+

高质量学术期刊OA论文的分析研究——以Web of Science核心合集为例 被引量:3

Research on the OA Papers in High-quality Academic Journals: A Case Study of Web of Science Core Collection
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]旨旨在全面了解开放获取论文的数量及开放获取率,并对其质量做出初步评价。[方法/过程]以Web of Science(Wo S)核心合集为数据源,从年代、研究领域、国家(地区)、发文机构4个维度统计2002-2016年15年间被Wo S收录的高质量学术期刊所发表的论文,进而分析解读OA论文的变化情况;最后以Nature为例,以篇均被引次数与高被引论文占比为切入点,对OA论文的质量作简要分析。[结果/结论 ]全球OA论文数量逐年增长,尤以中国为典型代表;中国科学院是Wo S平台收录论文最多的机构,2016年其OA论文量占据首位,但OA率与主要欧美机构尚有一定差距;生物医学领域的OA实践效果优于其他研究领域。 [Purpose/significance] This paper aims at getting a comprehensive understanding for the quantity and OA ratio of OA papers, and making a preliminary evaluation of these papers. [Method/process] In this paper, we utilized Web of Science Core Collection as the data source and took the four dimensions: publication years, research areas, countries/territories and organizations. We investigated papers published in high-quality academic journals that recorded in Wo S from 2002 to 2016. Then, we analyzed and interpreted the changes and trends of OA papers. Finally, we took Nature as an example and analyzed the quality of OA papers from the perspective of citation per paper and highly-cited papers proportion. [Result/conclusion] The number of OA papers in the world have been increasing year by year, especially in China. Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS) is the institution which has the largest number of papers recorded in Wo S, the number of OA papers took the first place in 2016, but the OA ratio still lagged behind major European and American institutions. The OA practice in the field of biological and medical sciences is superior to other research fields.
作者 朱江 任晓亚
出处 《知识管理论坛》 2018年第2期95-105,共11页 Knowledge Management Forum
基金 中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项项目"开放知识资源中心体系建设(二期)"(项目编号:中科院1705)研究成果之一
关键词 开放获取 OpenAccess OA率 WEB of SCIENCE 高质量学术期刊 open access OA OA ratio Web of Science high-quality academic journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1王学勤,韩仰东.开放访问期刊学术影响力的分析与评价[J].现代情报,2006,26(8):33-36. 被引量:10
  • 2陶雯,胡德华,曲艳吉,王敏.开放存取期刊质量评价方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2006,50(10):72-75. 被引量:34
  • 3图书情报工作.[2012-10一lo;.http://tsqb.qikan.corn/.
  • 4Digital Library Magazine. [ 2010 - 11 -01 ]. http://www, dlib. org.
  • 5图书馆理论与实践.[2012-09-18].http://www.nxlib.en/sylm/llysj//.
  • 6Bemers - Lee T . Linked data. 2012 - 09 - 25 ]. http ://www. w3. org/Designlssues/LinkedData, html.
  • 7David Shotton. The Five Stars of Online Journal Articles. [2012 - 11 - 10 ]. http ://www. dlib. org/dlib/januaryl212/shotton/01 shotton. html#12.
  • 8Suber P. Gratis and libre Open Access. [ 2012 - 10 - 08 ]. ht- tp ://www. arl. org,/sparc/publications/artieles/gratisandlibre, shtml.
  • 9Murray- Rust P . Green and Gold Open Access? . [2012-10 - 11 J. http ://doi. ieeecomputersociety, org/10. 1109/e - Science. 2009. 11.
  • 10苏金燕.开放存取期刊质量也有评估之法[N].中国社会科学报,2011-12-22,(014).

共引文献35

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部