期刊文献+

院前、院内小剂量重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的临床研究 被引量:1

A Clinical Study on Prehospital Versus In-hospital Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy With Low Dose Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :评价静脉小剂量重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂 (rt PA)院前救治急性心肌梗死的临床疗效 ,及其安全性和可行性。  方法 :所有确诊为急性心肌梗死的患者 ,院前给予小剂量rt PA (5 0mg)进行静脉溶栓治疗 (院前组 ,n =60 ) ,与院内应用小剂量rt PA (5 0mg)进行静脉溶栓的患者 (院内组 ,n =5 7)进行比较 ,观察发病—溶栓时间延迟对rt PA静脉溶栓疗效的影响。  结果 :院前组的冠状动脉总再通率为 91 7% ,明显高于院内组的 80 7% (P <0 0 5 ) ;病死率两组相比无显著性差异 (3 3 %vs 3 5 % ,P >0 0 5 ) ;两组患者均无需要输血的严重出血并发症 ;两组轻度出血的发生率 ,分别占病例总数的3 3 %和 3 5 % ,无显著性差异。  结论 :院前小剂量rt PA (5 0mg)静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死 ,只要适应证选择适当 ,能争取最大限度地挽救濒危的心肌组织 ,方法快速、简单、安全、有效 ,是可行的 ,并可能提高再通率。 Objective: To determine the clinic therapeutic effect of prehospital intravenous thrombolytic therapy with low dose of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator(rt-PA) in acute myocardial infarction(AMI) patients, and to verify the safety and feasibility of prehospital intravenous thrombolytic therapy. Methods: The trial enrolled 117 AMI patients presenting with ST-segment elevation, Among them, 60 AMI patients receiving prehospital intravenous thrombolytic therapy with low dose rt-PA (50*!mg) were included in the study as the prehospital group,the other 57 AMI patients received the same therapy during the hospital syay as the in-hospital group. The effect of the time from AMI attack to the delayed thrombolytic therapy on the terapeutic resulis of intravenous thrombolytic therapy with rt-PA was evaluated in AMI patients. Results: The total reopening rate of coronary blood vessel was 91.7% in prehospital group, and in contrast to 80.7% in in-hospital group (p<0.05). The mortality rate was similar between the two groups (3.3% vs 3.5%, p>0.05). There was no sever complicated hemorrhagia in both groups. The occurrence of mild bleeding was 3.3% in prehospital group and 3.5% in in-hospital group(p>0.05). Conclusion: Prehospital intravenous thrombolytic therapy with rt-PA in AMI patients can save the dying heart muscle cells.This method is rapid, easy, safe, and practical.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2003年第4期262-265,共4页 Chinese Circulation Journal
关键词 急性心肌梗死 重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂 院前救治 疗效 安全性 可行性 Myocardial infarction Thrombolytic therapy Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1321
  • 2李宗浩,蒋小燕,罗怡,张丽琨,王雪里红,韩树棠,杨萍芬,贾大成,路广森,冯庚.院外静脉溶栓救治急性心肌梗死[J].中国危重病急救医学,2000,12(11):666-666. 被引量:13
  • 3李成祥,李强,贾国良.急性心肌梗死院前、院内溶栓治疗的对照研究[J].中国急救医学,2000,20(5):269-270. 被引量:16
  • 4Brian GW, Kereiakes J, Edward N, et al. Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a north-south perspective. Am Heart J,1991, 121: 1-11.
  • 5Kleiger J, Douglas W, Jeffrey LA, et al. Time delays in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a tale of eight cities. Am Heart J,1990, 120: 773-780.
  • 6Douglas W. Time to thrombolytic treatment: factors affecting delay and their influence on outcome. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1995, 25 (Suppl) : $3-$5.
  • 7Gruppo Ilaliano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell Infarto Miocardico.GISSI-2: a factorial randomized trial of aheplase versus streptokinase andheparin versus no heparin among 12490 patients with acute myocardial in-farction. Lancet, 1990, 336: 65-71.
  • 8ISIS-3 (Third International Study of Infarct Survival)Collaborative Group.ISIS-3 : a randomized trial of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet, 1992, 339: 753-770.
  • 9ISIS-2 Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase,oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet, 1988, 2: 349.

二级参考文献18

共引文献1342

同被引文献115

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部