摘要
解志熙先生《'穆时英的最后'——关于他的附逆或牺牲问题之考辨》和孔刘辉先生《谍影重重——穆时英之死新探》两篇文章要么对关键材料视而不见,要么解读时持有深深的成见,它们的论证过程与观点皆经不起仔细推敲。既没有充足的理由证明穆时英是汉奸,也没有可靠的证据表明他是卧底。此事目前只能说是一个悬案。
Both the paper of'‘The last of Mu Shi-ying’——on His Trait or Sacrifice'by Mr.Xie Zhi-xi,and the paper'Numerous Spies——New Exploration on Mu Shi-ying’s Death'by Mr.Kon Liu-hui can not see the key materials or have deep prejudice in their understanding.So the evidence and views in the two papers involved won’t stand up to detailed criticism.So far it looks like the true identity of Mu Shi-ying was an unsettled question.
作者
管冠生
GUAN Guan-sheng(School of Literature and Media,Taishan University,Taian 271000,China)
出处
《太原学院学报(社会科学版)》
2019年第4期25-37,共13页
Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
穆时英
卧底
附逆
Mu Shi-ying
undercover
traitor