期刊文献+

中美贸易战中中方反制行为的合法性分析

Legitimacy of China’s Countermeasures in the Sino-US Trade War
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国公然违反WTO规则单方面对中国产品征收巨额关税,其前所未有的规模与严重的损害后果使得中国有权根据《关税与贸易总协定》(GATT)中国家安全例外的规定在适当限度内采取贸易反制措施,以此应对美国引发的国际关系中的紧急情况。即使中国无法成功援引安全例外条款,在继续适用WTO规则引起制度失灵的情况下,退而求其次诉诸于一般国际法规则也具有合理之处。通过论证安全例外条款在中美贸易战中的适用,分析中国依据WTO协议本身所能获得的救济途径,并在此基础上分析WTO法与国际法的关系,寻找一般国际法规则作为论证中美贸易战中中方贸易反制行为合法性的依据。 The United States flagrantly violates WTO rules and imposes huge tariffs on Chinese products unilaterally.Its unprecedented scale and serious damages have made China entitled to take trade countermeasures within appropriate limits in accordance with the provisions of the National Security Exceptions in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade so as to deal with an emergency in international relations caused by the USA.Even if China’s countermeasure cannot be justified under Article XXI of GATT 1994,in the case of regime failure arising from application WTO rules,a fallback resort to general international law is feasible.The author analyzes the application of the national security exception in the Sino-US trade war and the remedies that China can obtain according to the WTO agreement itself.On this basis,the author analyzes the relationship between WTO law and international law so as to justify China’s countermeasures under general international rules.
作者 杨雨馨 YANG Yu-xin(School of Law,Nankai University of China,Tianjin 300350,China)
机构地区 南开大学法学院
出处 《天津法学》 2019年第2期28-34,共7页 Tianjin Legal Science
关键词 贸易反制 国家安全例外 制度失灵 一般国际法规则 countermeasures national security exception regime failure general international rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1[3]United States-Trade Measures Affecting Nicaragua,GATT Document.L/6053(1986).
  • 2[4]参见Statement of the EEC Representative,GATT Doc.C/M157 at 10(1982).
  • 3[5]Decision Concerning Article XXI of the General Agreement,NOV.30,1982,GATT B.I.S.D.(29th Supplementary)(1983),at 23-24.
  • 4[8]GATT ANALYTICAL INDEX:GUIDE TO GATT LAW AND PRACTICE 600(Updated 6th ed.1995),at 604,600-605.
  • 5[9]United States-The Cuban Liberty and Democratic SolidarityAct,WT/DS 38/1(May 13,1996).
  • 6[10]Pub.L.No.104-114(1996),110 Stat 785,reprinted in 35 I.L.M.357.
  • 7[11]Request for the Establishment of a Panel by the European Communities on the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act,WT/DS 38/2(Oct 8,1996);WT/DSB/M/24(Minutes of Meeting of the DSB held on Oct 16,1996);WT/DSB/M26(Minutes of the Meeting of the DSB held on Nov 20,1996).
  • 8[12]Dispute Settlement Body,Minutes of Meeting Held on Oct.16,1996,WT/DSB/M/24(Nov.26,1996).
  • 9[13]参阅U.S.Says WTO Panel Not Competent to Judge Cuba Dispute,Hopes to Settle,14 Int'1 Trade Rep.(BNA),No.9,at 351(Feb.26,1997);US Vows to Boycott WTO Panel:Move Escalates Fight With European Union Doer Cuba Sanctions,WASH.POST,Feb.21,1997,at A1;David E.Sanger,U.S.Won't Of fer Trade Testimony on Cuba Embargo,N.Y.TIMES,Feb.21,1997,at A1.
  • 10[14]Dispute Settlement Body,Minutes of Meeting Held on Npv.20,1996,WT/DSB/M/26(Jan.15,1997).

共引文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部