期刊文献+

义务教育后的受教育权利:资助终身学习的教育券制度 被引量:4

Post-Compulsory Entitlements: Vouchers for Life-long Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为保障义务教育之后的受教育权利的一种方法 ,教育券被提议用来资助终身学习。这类教育券会提供给所有完成义务教育的人 ,以资助他们选择更广泛的教育培训。保障后义务教育权利的资助形式有助学金和按收入的一定比例偿还的贷款。后者可以通过投资教育和培训获得的更高收入来偿还。文章阐述了教育权利资助机制的全面性和灵活性会提高教育和培训的公平与效率。文中讨论了资金、规章制度和支持服务等各个方面 ,同时 。 Educational vouchers in the form of post compulsory entitlements (PCE's) are proposed as a method for financing life long learning. These entitlements would be provided to all persons after they complete compulsory education and could be used for a wide variety of approved education and training options. PCE's would be composed of both grants and income contingent loans, the latter payable from the higher incomes generated by education and training investments. It is argued that the comprehensiveness and flexibility of the entitlement mechanism would improve both equity and efficiency of education and training. Issues of finance, regulation, and support services are discussed as well as the contention that the GI Bill for Veterans' Educational Benefits provides a useful historical experience for considering PCE's.
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 2003年第4期54-61,89,共9页 Peking University Education Review
关键词 后义务教育 受教育权利 终身学习 教育券制度 教育政策 美国 post compulsory education life long education entitlements educational vouchers
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1H M Levin. The Public - Private Nexus in Education[J] .American Behavioral Scientist, 1999,43( 1) : 124 - 37.
  • 2H M Levin & C Driver. The Cost of an Educational Voucher System [ J ]. Education Economics, 1998,6 ( 3 ) :201 - 217.
  • 3L L Leslie & P T Brinkman. The Economic Value ofHigher Education[ M ]. New York: Macmillan, 1988 : 107- 22.
  • 4M Friedman, The Role of Government in Education[A] In Capitalism and Freedom [ M ] Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962:85- 107.
  • 5US. Congressional Budget Ofi%e. Veterans' Educational Benefits: Issues Concerning the GI Bill. Washington, D.C. : 1978.
  • 6D M O'Neil and S Ross. Voucher Funding of Training:A Study of the GI Bill, PRI 321 - 76. Arlington, VA:Public Research Institute, 1976:44.
  • 7O'Neill & Ross, 1976:53.
  • 8H M Levin. Vouchers and Social Equity [ J]. Change, (October 1973), 29 - 33 for an early version.
  • 9The report for the U.S. research project is H M Levin, H M Levin, Post- Secondary Entitlements: An Exploration. In N B Kurland, Ed., Entitlement Papers, NIE Papers in Education and Work : Number Four ( Washington, D. C. :National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Health,Education and Welfare, 1977).
  • 10The OECD version is summarized in H M Levin,"Individual Entitlements" In H M Levin & H G Schutze, Eds., Financing Recurrent Education (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983:39 - 66.

同被引文献39

  • 1刘复兴.市场条件下的教育公平:问题与制度安排[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005(1):23-29. 被引量:63
  • 2米尔顿·弗里德曼 罗斯·弗里德曼.自由选择:个人声明[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.164.
  • 3亚当·斯密.国富论[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,2001..
  • 4斯密.国富论[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,2001.
  • 5Archibald, George. College vouchers put a face on funds in Colorado [ N ]. Washington Times, 2005 - 05 - 31.
  • 6The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. Measuring Up 2002: The State-by-State Report Card for Higher Education[EB/OL]. [ 2006 - 04 - 23 ]. http ://measuringup, highereducation.org/2002/pdf/MeasUp2002.pdf.
  • 7Keckhaver, John & Jon Peacock. A Colorado Example:What TABOR Could Mean for Public Education in Wisconsin: Executive Summary [ R ]. Madison : Wisconsin Council on Children and Families, 2004.
  • 8Russo, Alexander. Varsity Vouchers. Colorado has come up with a novel way to fund higher education. Send the money with the students [ J ]. State Legislatures, 2004 (6) : 27.
  • 9Tomlinson, Danny L. Summary of the 2005 session of the Colorado General Assembly [ R ]. Denver: Tomlinson & Associates, 2005.
  • 10Hansen, L. W & Burton Weisbrod. The Distribution of Costs and Direct Benefits of Public Higher Education: The Case of California[J]. Journal of Human Resources, 1969(2) : 176- 191.

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部