摘要
约翰·齐曼认为当代科学正在从学院时代走向后学院时代,因此有必要站在自然主义的客观立场,综合已有各种元科学理论,对学院科学时代的默顿科学规范的合法性和适用性作出全面的审视。他为此对自然科学和人文科学进行了广角特写,既承认了它们的独特价值,又揭示出其本身所具有的合理性、可信性和普适性的局限。齐曼证明,科学知识那些熟悉的"哲学"特征与日常认知能力以及科学知识生产者之间的奇特的社会关系难分难解。注重团队合作和考评制的新"后学院"研究文化在哲学上正或好或坏地改变着那些曾认为是永恒的科学特征。
John Ziman considers that the contemporary scienc e is just from academic to post-academic, so a realistic standpoint and all kinds of meta-science theories must be used to survey the post-academic science. Zi man shows that the familiar 'philosophical' features of scientific knowledge a re inseparable from the ordinary cognitive capabilities and peculiar social rela tionships of its producers. This wide-angled close-up of the natural and human sciences recognizes their unique value, whilst revealing the limits of their ra tionality, reliability and universal applicability. It also shows how, for bette r or worse, the new 'post-academic' research culture of teamwork, accountabil ity, etc. is changing these supposedly eternal philosophical characteristics.
出处
《科学学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第5期556-560,共5页
Studies in Science of Science
