新发现朱熹佚文真伪考辨——兼谈《泉州同安鹤浦祖祠堂记》的研究价值

To Distinquish between Truth and Falsehood about New Discovered Zhu Xi's Lost Writing——Also talking the research value about 《A Note of Hepu's Ancestral Hall,Tongan Quanzhou》

朱熹诸多佚文散见于文献与民间,而如郑武成先生新发现的《泉州同安鹤浦祖祠堂记》论及风水(堪舆)者鲜。因明清时代伪托之篇什时有所见,故其真伪不可不辨。经考证,我们初步认为,这一佚文的前面部分(正文)为朱熹所作,后面部分(附记)属于伪托。

Zhu Xi's lost writings scattered in documents and the folk,for example,new discovered《A Note of Hepu's Ancestral Hall,Tongan Quanzhou》by Mr. Zheng Wu-cheng,but touched less upon Feng-Shui(Kan-Yu). Because forged writings occured occasionally at Ming and Qing Dynasties, its truth or falsehood should not undistinquish. Through textual research we consider tentatively that the front part (the main body) of the lost writing is Zhu Xi's writing,and the back part(the appendix)is forged.