期刊文献+

不对称信息、交易成本与投资者保护:内地(中国大陆)和香港的比较研究 被引量:20

Asymmetric Information, Transaction Cost and Investor Protection: Comparison of Mainland and Hong Kong...
原文传递
导出
摘要 投资者保护环境的建设是我国证券市场发展中一项重要任务,投资者保护环境欠佳会降低股票交易的流动性,提高交易成本。但是研究中由于无法排除市场本身的差异,我们往往很难度量我国的投资者保护环境与发达市场经济国家和地区的差异。本文选取在香港证券交易所上市交易的中国大陆公司股票和香港本地公司股票,对比分析两地股票在交易中的不对称信息成本。在同一市场结构下,我们发现中国大陆公司股票的不对称信息成本大约是香港本地公司股票的两倍,而且在排除股票交易活动变量和市值的影响后,这个效应依然显著。进一步的检验发现,上述效应并非只限于大陆政府相关的公司,因而排除了国家参与的治理结构导致信息不对称增大的可能性。本文的结论认为中国大陆较差的投资者保护环境导致了大陆股票在交易中较大的信息不对称成本。 A healthily investor protection is an important pursuit in the development of capital markets. Poor investor protection leads to lower liquidity in stock trading, consequently raising transaction costs. In the research, however, the difficulty in separating effects of investor protection from effects of market mechanism makes it tough to directly measure the differences in investor protection of China and of other developed countries. In this paper, the authors select China's Mainland - based stocks and Hong Kong - based stocks from the same market, the Hong Kong Security Exchange, and compare the asymmetric information cost of China's Mainland - based stocks with that of Hong Kong -based stocks. Hie cost of asymmetric information is shown to be twice as much for China's Mainland - based stocks as for Hong Kong - based stocks. The effect remains even controlling for trading variables and market capitalization. The possibility that the effect is caused by government - related ownership also is ruled out. Based on the empirical analysis, the conclusion is that the poor investor protection in China's Mainland causes,the high costs of information asymmetry in trading of China's Mainland - based stocks.
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第10期27-36,共10页 Journal of Financial Research
基金 中国香港特别行政区研究资助局(研资局)全额资助(项目号:CityU 1081/02E)
关键词 投资者保护 信息不对称 市场摩擦 investor protection, information asymmetry, market friction
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Brennan, Michael J. and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 1995, investment analysis and price formation in securities markets, Journal of Financial Economics 38 (1995), 361- 381.
  • 2Brockman, Paul and Dennis Y. Chung, 2002, investor protection and firm liquidity, Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
  • 3Easley, David, Soeren Hvidkjaer and Maureen O'Hara, 2002, Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? The Journal of Finance, October 2002, 2185 - 2221.
  • 4Hasbrouck, Joel, 1991, Measuring the information content of stock trades, The Journal of Finance, March 1991, 179-207.
  • 5Huang, Roger D. and Hans R. Stoll, 1997, The components of the bid - ask spread: a general approach, The Review of Financial Studies, Winter 1997, 995- 1034.
  • 6Kyle, A, 1985, Continuous auctions and insider trading, Econometrica 53, 1315- 1336.
  • 7La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez - de - Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny, 2002,.The Journal of Finance, June 2002, 1147 - 1169.
  • 8Leuz, Christian, Dhananjay Nanda and Peter D. Wysocki, 2002, Earning management and investor protection: an international comparison, Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming.
  • 9Shleifer, Andrei and Daniel Wolfenzon, 2002, Investor protection and equity markets, Journal of Financial Economics 66(2002), 3 - 27.
  • 10Stoll, Hans R , 1999, Friction, Journal of Finance, August 2000, 1479 - 1514.

同被引文献202

引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部