期刊文献+

移动Ad-hoc网络中不同路由协议的TCP性能比较 被引量:4

TCP Performance Comparison of Different Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对Ad-hoc网络路由协议的TCP性能展开研究.通过仿真实验对3种路由协议DSDV、DSR和AODV的TCP性能进行了对比,发现了TCP不同于UDP的拥塞控制/避免机制对Ad-hoc网络性能产生的显著影响.并从路由机制角度分别分析了节点移动性、TCP连接数及接口队列长度对网络TCP性能的影响.从而对提高Ad-hoc路由协议的TCP性能提出改进方案. Research on mobile Ad-hoc networks has been mainly focused on performance comparison of routing protocols using UDP/CBR traffic flows. TCP traffic, which is the dominant traffic type of the internet and has significant different characteristics and profound flow control mechanisms, has been overlooked. This paper studied the performance of three routing protocols-DSDV, DSR and AODV based on TCP traffic flows. In addition, the effects of node mobility, number of TCP connections and maximum length of interface queue on TCP performance were discussed from the viewpoint of different mechanisms of Ad-hoc routing protocols. Finally, further improvements on those routing protocols were proposed to achieve better performance of TCP flow transmission.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第10期1624-1627,1633,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60272082 69972028)
关键词 移动AD-HOC网络 传输控制协议 路由协议 吞吐量 Computer simulation Network protocols Operations research Throughput
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Stevens W R 范建华 胥光辉等译.TCP/IP详解,卷1:协议[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000..
  • 2Perkins C E, Bhagwat P. Highly dynamic desti-nation-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computer [A]. Proceeding of the ACMSIGCOMM'94 Conference on Communication Architectures, Protocols and Applications [C]. London,UK, Aug, 1994. 234--244.
  • 3Johnson D, Maltz D, Hu Y, et al. The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile Ad hoc networks[EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-dsr-05. txt, 2001-03-15.
  • 4Perkins C, Royer E, Das S. Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing [EB/OL]. http://www. ietf. org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-aodv-08. txt. 2001-03-20.
  • 5Broch J, Maltz D, Johnson D, et al. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless Ad hoc network routing protocols[A]. Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM/IEEE International Confernece on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM'98)[C].Dallas, TX, USA, 1998.85-97.
  • 6Perkins C, Royer E, Das S, et al. Performance comparsion of two on-demand routing protoeols for Ad hoc networks[J]. IEEE Personal Communications,2001,8(1):16-28.
  • 7Goff T, Abu-Ghazalch N B, Phatak D S. Analysis of TCP performance on Ad-hoc networks using preemptive maintenance routing [A]. Parallel Processing, Proceeding of International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Computing[C].Valencia Spain, 2001. 232-239.
  • 8Holland G, Vaidya N H. Analysis of TCP performance over mobile Ad-hoc networks [A]. Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM'99)[C]. Seattle, 1999. 219-230.
  • 9Hu Y C, Johnson D. Caching strategies in on-demand routing protocols for wireless Ad-hoc networks[A]. Proceeding of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking(MOBICOM'00) [C], Boston, MA, 2000. 231-242.

共引文献3

同被引文献17

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部