摘要
目的:比较输尿管结石气压弹道碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术的疗效。方法:回顾分析130例气压弹碎石术与1600例体外冲击波碎石术的的碎石率、结石排净率、平均结石排净时间及并发症发生率。结果:气压弹道碎石术碎石率、结石排净率均大于体外冲击波碎石术,平均结石排出时间小于体外冲击波碎石术,并发症发生率两组间无明显差异。结论:输尿管结石行气压弹道碎石术优于体外冲击波碎石术。
Objective Evaluate endoscopic pneumatic lithotripsy ( PL ) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy ( ESWL) for treatment of ureteral calculi. Methods The 1730 cases with ureteral calculi wer treated by PL and ESWL. Results of the 130 ptients 121 were successful in PL , of the 1600 patients 1093 were successful in ESWL. Conclutions The endoscop-ic pneumatic lithotripsy was better than extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of ureteral calculi.
出处
《河南外科学杂志》
2003年第6期7-8,共2页
Henan Journal of Surgery
