期刊文献+

词“婉约”与“豪放”说略 被引量:2

A Discussion on “婉约”—— Subtle & Concise School of Ci Writing and “豪放”— Powerful & Free School of Ci Writing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 词有“婉约”、“豪放”之分 ,始于明人张纣延 ,而以此划分词派则在清代。词或“婉约”或“豪放”相关词人作词的主观原理 ,相关词人自身的资质、气度 ,还与作品的题材及作品产生的文化背景相关。对“婉约”、“豪放” ,前人尚有正、变之议 ,今人则认为是一体分流 ,双峰并峙。我们要善于分别同一词派词作。 Ci writing styles are divided into “婉约”—— Subtle & Concise and “豪放”—— Powerful & Free. The division began with Zhang Yan in the Ming Dynasty. During the Qing Dynasty,Ci writing developed into two schools.The use of either Subtle & Concise or Powerful & Free is closely associated with the subject and background of authors' works in addition to their subjective principles implemented in writing, intelligence and liberality. As to Subtle & Concise and Powerful & Free, people in ancient times were divided on the argument that the former is orthodox while the latter is not. People in modern times believe that the two schools are like two peaks standing side by side. So, the key point is to be able to recognize the differences in styles between works written by authors of the same school, and those by the same author.
作者 杨旭升
出处 《绵阳师范学院学报》 2003年第1期47-51,共5页 Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
关键词 文化 婉约派 豪放派 “婉约” “豪放” expectations intelligence and liberality subjects cultural backgrounds branches of a style peaks standing side by side differences in styles 〔Notes: “词”(Ci) is a kind of Chinese poem. 〕
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1(宋)王灼等撰陈颖杰校释词品[M].
  • 2叶嘉莹.叶嘉莹说词[M]上海古籍出版社,1999.
  • 3缪钺.缪钺说词[M]上海古籍出版社,1999.

同被引文献2

  • 1田耕滋.词分豪放与婉约的诗学意义[J]西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2000(02).
  • 2(清)刘熙载,.艺概[M]上海古籍出版社,1978.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部